 | Ernest Washington Chance - 1922 - 622 דפים
...estimate may appeal to the court. Debts not provable.— Certain debts are not provable, viz., (1) Demands in the nature of unliquidated damages arising otherwise than by reason of a contract, promise, or breach of trust. (2) Debts or liabilities contracted by the debtor, subsequently to the... | |
 | Arthur Underhill - 1922 - 478 דפים
...entitled to maintain and defend all actions "relating to the property of the debtor." By section 44 (i) " demands in the nature of unliquidated damages arising otherwise than by reason of a contract, promise, or breach of trust shall not be provable in bankruptcy or in proceedings under an authorised... | |
 | Institute of Bankers (Great Britain) - 1923 - 560 דפים
...incurred before the date of the receiving order, are provable. There are certain exceptions, such as demands in the nature of unliquidated damages arising otherwise than by reason of a contract, promise, or breach of trust ; and anyone having notice of an act of bankruptcy or the presentation... | |
 | Richard Ringwood - 1924 - 422 דפים
...respect of the tort cannot be made against his estate, for by s. 30 of the Bankruptcy Act, 1914, '' Demands in the nature of unliquidated damages arising otherwise than by reason of a contract, promise, or breach of trust, shall not be provable in bankruptcy." As such demands are not provable,... | |
 | Lionel Cuthbert Cropper - 1924 - 1188 דפים
...before the date of the RO, are provable in bankruptcy. The following are not provable (S. 30) : — (a) Demands in the nature of unliquidated damages arising otherwise than by reason of contract, promise, or breach of trust. (b) Debts or liabilities contracted by the debtor with any person... | |
 | 1925 - 884 דפים
...debts provable under this Act." The only limitation in sub-S. (2) of S. 28 in the Act of 1907 is. that demands in the nature of unliquidated damages arising otherwise than by reason of a contract or breach of trust shall not be provable under this Act, while the limitation in clause (1) of S. 34.... | |
 | Great Britain - 1883 - 546 דפים
...full if paid into Court. PART III. ADMINISTRATION OF PROPERTY. Proof of Debts. Description of 37. (l.) Demands in the nature of unliquidated damages arising otherwise than by reason of a contract, promise, or breach of trust, shall not be provable in bankruptcy. liability contracted by the debtor... | |
 | Benjamin Lennard Cherry, Edward Parker Wolstenholme - 1927 - 1290 דפים
...prove for the whole amount due to him: Bkcy. A., 1914, 2nd Seh.,r. 10; Be Nelson, 1919, 147 LT Jour. 4. Demands in the nature of unliquidated damages arising otherwise than by reason of a contract, promise, or breach of trust, are not provcable: Bkcy. A., 1914, 9. -30 (1). As to contingent or future... | |
 | John Mews - 1925 - 876 דפים
...against G. 's estate as creditors for the sum found due from him in the action, it not being a " demand in the nature of unliquidated damages arising otherwise than by reason of a contract." Emma Silver Mining Co. v. Grant, 50 LJ Ch. 440; 17 Ch. D. 122; 29 WB 481. Held, also, that the debt... | |
 | Robert Harry Inglis Palgrave, Henry Higgs - 1926 - 886 דפים
...Bankruptcy Act 1883. Section 37 of that act defines what debts are provable. It first provides that "demands in the nature of unliquidated damages, arising otherwise than by reason of a contract promise or breach of trust, shall not be provable." The object of this provision is to exclude claims... | |
| |
Demands in the nature of unliquidated damages arising otherwise than by reason of a contract, promise, or breach of trust, shall not be provable in bankruptcy. 
