 | 1916 - 1380 דפים
...Shelby County Taxing Diet. 120 US 489, 7 S. Ct. 502, 30 US (L. I'd.) 694, at page 497, it was said that "the negotiation of sales of goods which are in another...for the purpose of introducing them into the State in which the negotiation is made, is interstate commerce." Kidd v. Pearson, 128 US 1, 20, 9 S. Ct.... | |
 | Missouri. Supreme Court - 1916 - 902 דפים
...established beyond controversy that "the negotiation of sales of goods that are Fleming v. Mexico. in another State for the purpose of introducing them into the State in which the negotiation is made is interstate commerce" and is protected from local interference,... | |
 | William Mark McKinney, Burdett Alberto Rich, Charles Porterfield, S. B. Fisher - 1917 - 1452 דפים
...117 Note: 2 Ann. Cas. 956 et leq. Tenn. 618, 100 SW 705, 10 KR.A. And see infra, par. 146. 63 tion of sales of goods which are in another state, for the purpose of introducing them into the state in which the negotiation is made, is interstate commerce, and the power of Congress to regulate commerce... | |
 | 1918 - 508 דפים
...of Eckman's Alterative v. United States, 239 US 510, 514. It is also settled by our decisions that 'the negotiation of sales of goods which are in another...for the purpose of introducing them into the state in which the negotiation is made, is interstate commerce.' Robbins v. Shelby Taxing District, 120 US... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1918 - 1104 דפים
...12 Wheat. 447(6: 688); Woodruff v. Parham, 75 U. 8. 8 Wall. 132 (19: 384). The negotiation of sale of goods, which are In another State, for the purpose of introducing them into the State in which the sale is mude, is interstate commerce. Robbins v. Shelby County Taxing Dist. 120 U. 8.... | |
 | Sir John Quick - 1919 - 1036 דפים
...rivers : United Mates v. Chandler Dunbar Co., (1912) 229 US, 53. Negotiations in one State for the sale of goods which are in another State for the purpose of introducing them into the State in which the negotiation is made, constitutes inter-state commerce : Stewart v. Michigan, (1913) 232... | |
 | Sir John Quick - 1919 - 1048 דפים
...that position is Steward v. Michigan, 232 US, 665, where it was held following a prior decision, that the negotiation of sales of goods which are in another State for the purposes of introducing them into the State in which the negotiation is made is inter- state commerce.... | |
 | 1925 - 516 דפים
...United States in Real Silk Hosiery Mills v. City of Portland, 45 S. Ct. 525, 69 L. Ed. — , wrote: " 'The negotiation of sales of goods which are in another...for the purpose of introducing them into the state in which the negotiation is made, is interstate commerce.' Manifestly, no license fee could have been... | |
| |
The negotiation of sales of goods which are in another State, for the purpose of introducing them into the State in which the negotiation is made, is interstate commerce. 
