 The interpretation of the laws is the proper and peculiar province of the courts. A constitution is in fact, and must be, regarded by the judges as a fundamental law. It therefore belongs to them to ascertain its meaning as well as the meaning of any...  The Federalist on the New Constitution - עמוד 315מאת Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, John Jay - 1831 - 542 דפיםתצוגה מלאה - מידע על ספר זה
 | Massachusetts. Constitutional Convention - 1919 - 1228 דפים
...written by Alexander Hamilton so many years ago, but as I have said, of special meaning even to-day: The interpretation of the laws is the proper and peculiar...be regarded by the judges, as a fundamental law. It therefore belongs to them to ascertain its meaning, as well as the meaning of any particular act proceeding... | |
 | William Maxwell Evarts - 1919 - 768 דפים
...people to substitute their will to that of their constituents. It is far more rational to suppose that the courts were designed to be an intermediate body...be regarded by the judges as a fundamental law. It therefore belongs to them to ascertain its meaning, as well as the meaning of any particular act proceeding... | |
 | Massachusetts. Constitutional Convention - 1919 - 1222 דפים
...written by Alexander Hamilton so many years ago, but as I have said, of special meaning even to-day: The interpretation of the laws is the proper and peculiar...and must be regarded by the judges, as a fundamental lav. It therefore belongs to them to ascertain its meaning, as well as the meaning of any particular... | |
 | Albert Jeremiah Beveridge - 1919 - 720 דפים
...Elliot's Debates were not published until 1827-30. "The interpretation of the laws," wrote Hamilton, "is the proper and peculiar province of the courts....be regarded by the judges, as a fundamental law. It therefore belongs to them to ascertain its meaning, as well as the meaning of any particular act proceeding... | |
 | Albert Jeremiah Beveridge - 1919 - 690 דפים
...debates in which they were particularly interested. ton, The interpretation of the laws," wrote Hamilis the proper and peculiar province of the /courts. A...be regarded by the judges, as a fundamental law. It therefore belongs to them to ascertain its meaning, as well as the meaning of any particular act proIceeding... | |
 | Thomas James Norton - 1922 - 332 דפים
...people to substitute their will to that of their constituents. It is far more rational to suppose, that the courts were designed to be an intermediate body...be regarded by the judges, as a fundamental law. It therefore belongs to them to ascertain its meaning, as well as the meaning of any particular act proceeding... | |
 | Thomas James Norton - 1922 - 350 דפים
...people to substitute their will to that of their constituents. It is far more rational to suppose, that the courts were designed to be an intermediate body...be regarded by the judges, as a fundamental law. It therefore belongs to them to ascertain its meaning, as well as the meaning of any particular act proceeding... | |
 | Thomas James Norton - 1922 - 332 דפים
...people to substitute their will to that of their constituents. It is far more rational to suppose, that the courts were designed to be an intermediate body...be regarded by the judges, as a fundamental law. It therefore belongs to them to ascertain its meaning, as well as the meaning of any particular act proceeding... | |
 | H. Knust - 1922 - 180 דפים
...des Councils, die Stellung des Vizepräsidenten, die Kongreßbot*) Hamilton, Federalist, S. 521/22: »The courts were designed to be an intermediate body between the people and the legislature, in order . . . to keep the latter within the limits assigned to their authority«. S. 522: »The power of the... | |
| |
