Confucian Political EthicsDaniel A. Bell Princeton University Press, 2008 - 273 עמודים For much of the twentieth century, Confucianism was condemned by Westerners and East Asians alike as antithetical to modernity. Internationally renowned philosophers, historians, and social scientists argue otherwise in Confucian Political Ethics. They show how classical Confucian theory--with its emphasis on family ties, self-improvement, education, and the social good--is highly relevant to the most pressing dilemmas confronting us today. Drawing upon in-depth, cross-cultural dialogues, the contributors delve into the relationship of Confucian political ethics to contemporary social issues, exploring Confucian perspectives on civil society, government, territorial boundaries and boundaries of the human body and body politic, and ethical pluralism. They examine how Confucianism, often dismissed as backwardly patriarchal, can in fact find common ground with a range of contemporary feminist values and need not hinder gender equality. And they show how Confucian theories about war and peace were formulated in a context not so different from today's international system, and how they can help us achieve a more peaceful global community. This thought-provoking volume affirms the enduring relevance of Confucian moral and political thinking, and will stimulate important debate among policymakers, researchers, and students of politics, philosophy, applied ethics, and East Asian studies. The contributors are Daniel A. Bell, Joseph Chan, Sin Yee Chan, Chenyang Li, Richard Madsen, Ni Lexiong, Peter Nosco, Michael Nylan, Henry Rosemont, Jr., and Lee H. Yearley. |
מתוך הספר
תוצאות 1-3 מתוך 56
... reason . Avoid- ance of punishment is not a right reason for virtuous action . The law is thus not a good instrument of moral edification . Anyone recogniz- ing this point would want to limit the scope of criminal law . Neither should ...
... reason for the state to promote or prohibit it . But this reason has to compete with other reasons , which may or may not outweigh the first . These competing reasons come from what I call the second tendency of thought regarding ...
... reasons for invoking Mencius's theory of just war . The first reason is psychological . If there is rough agreement on the aims of a theory of just war - that it should prohibit wars of conquest and justify certain kinds of wars of self ...