מה אומרים אנשים - כתיבת ביקורת
לא מצאנו ביקורות במקומות הרגילים
מהדורות אחרות - הצג הכל
Aaron Burr acres afterwards American appointed army Arthur St Assembly authority Bank became bill Blennerhassett boat British Burr's canal Capitol at Columbus character Charles Willing Byrd Chillicothe church Cincinnati citizens Clair Colonel command committee common schools Congress Connecticut Constitutional Convention Cutler December declared dollars duty early Edward Tiffin elected enemy established favorable February Federal Federalist friends Governor St Governor Tiffin Hamilton County Harrison honor House of Representatives hundred Indians inhabitants Jeremiah Morrow Judge Burnet judicial justice Kirtland labor land legislation Legislature letter March Marietta Meigs ment militia Mormon Nathaniel Massie Northwest Territory Ohio River Ordinance party passed period pioneer political proceeded purpose Republican resolution result school system Scioto Gazette sentiment session Sidney Rigdon slavery statehood Supreme Court Thomas Kirker Thomas Worthington tion town United States Senator Virginia vote Washington West Western William
עמוד 154 - The interpretation of the laws is the proper and peculiar province of the courts. A constitution is in fact, and must be, regarded by the judges as a fundamental law. It therefore belongs to them to ascertain its meaning as well as the meaning of any particular act proceeding from the legislative body.
עמוד 154 - It is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is. Those who apply the rule to particular cases, must of necessity expound and interpret that rule. If two laws conflict with each other, the courts must decide on the operation of each.
עמוד 154 - So if a law be in opposition to the constitution, if both the law and the constitution apply to a particular case so that the court must either decide that case conformably to the law disregarding the constitution or conformably to the constitution disregarding the law, the court must determine which of these conflicting rules governs the case. This is of the very essence of judicial duty.
עמוד 154 - no tax or duty shall be laid on articles exported from any state." Suppose a duty on the export of cotton, of tobacco, or of flour; and a suit instituted to recover it. Ought judgment to be rendered in such a case? Ought the judges to close their eyes on the Constitution, and only see the law? The Constitution declares "that no bill of attainder or ex post facto law shall be passed.
עמוד 82 - And whenever any of the said states shall have sixty thousand free inhabitants therein, such state shall be admitted, by its delegates, into the Congress of the United States, on an equal footing with the original states, in all respects whatever...
עמוד 434 - And it is further understood and declared that the boundaries of these three States shall be subject so far to be altered, that, if Congress shall hereafter find it expedient they shall have authority to form one or two States in that part of the said territory which lies north of an east and west line drawn through the southerly bend or extreme of Lake Michigan.
עמוד 317 - After the most deliberate consideration, it is the unanimous and decided opinion of this court that the act to incorporate the bank of the United States is a law made in pursuance of the constitution, and is a part of the supreme law of the land.
עמוד 82 - State government; provided the Constitution and government, so to be formed, shall be republican, and in conformity to the principles contained in these articles...
עמוד 154 - If, however, such a bill should be passed, and a person should be prosecuted under it, must the court condemn to death those victims whom the constitution endeavors to preserve? "No person," says the constitution, "shall be convicted of treason unless on the testimony of two witnesses to the same overt act, or on confession in open court.