Secularism, Democracy, Justice: Implications of Rawlsian Principles in IndiaSAGE Publications, 20 באפר׳ 1998 - 224 עמודים For the major part of the 20th century, the concepts of individual liberty and social justice have been viewed as being mutually exclusive. However, John RawlsÆ Theory of Justice (1971) radically altered this perspective by providing the most elaborate example of the coexistence of liberty and egalitarian principles. The first principle of his theory refers to liberty while the second principle (pertaining to social justice) consists of fair equality of opportunity and the difference principle. Secularism, Democracy, Justice undertakes the difficult, yet challenging, task of applying these Rawlsian principles to four major areasùsecularism, democracy, social justice, and agencyùin Indian context. Relying largely on the Kantian notions of rationality and universality, Nalini Rajan combines a philosophical analysis of the Rawlsian framework with a defense of certain kinds of state policies. Within these four major areas, she discusses secularism and the rationale for a uniform civil code; the necessity for greater democratic participation as well as its limits; the importance of positive discrimination to combat social backwardness; and the role of self and of universality in realizing human agency. While the issues raised are riddled with practical and theoretical difficulties, this book effectively seeks answers to some of the major problems plaguing fragile institutions like secularism, democracy, and social justice. |
מהדורות אחרות - הצג הכל
מונחים וביטויים נפוצים
According advantage aims amendment argue argument autonomy basic basis better called caste Chapter citizens civil society claims committed conception concerned considered Constitution context critical cultural democracy democratic depends difference difference principle discussed distribution economic effect ends equal fact favour feminists freedom fundamental Gandhi gender groups Hindu historical human idea ideal ignorance important Indian individual institutions interests issue justice Kantian kind liberal libertarian liberty limit majority Marxism matter means MICHIGAN moral movement Muslim namely nature neutrality notion obligation parties perspective pluralism political position possible practice preferences present principle problem promoting question radical rational Rawls Rawls's Rawlsian Rawlsian theory reason recent relations religion religious reservation respect rule says secular sense social theory tion tolerance universal utilitarian values welfare women