תמונות בעמוד
PDF
ePub

We must

people, and does not suffer them to perish. |jects. Meanwhile we must feed on what he And is not all this so much preparation for gives us out of his treasures. that predicted time when he will at length keep on coming to him for spiritual food, in reveal himself to them, and they will at length expectation of that time when the famine acknowledge him? And may we not believe will be over for ever; when we shall hunger that the time is actually drawing near when no more, and thirst no more; when the the disclosure will be made-when they shall Lamb on the throne shall feed us, and wipe look on him whom they pierced-when the all tears from our eyes. natural branches shall be grafted in again? “For I would not, brethren, that ye should be ignorant of this mystery-that blindness in part hath happened unto Israel, until the fulness of the Gentiles be come in, and so all Israel shall be saved." As it is written, "there shall come out of Zion the deliverer, and shall turn away ungodliness from Jacob; for this is my covenant unto them, when Í shall take away their sins." But O! what a blessed reconciliation will that be when the

wretched Jewish people, which hath so long been a memorial to the world, of God's wrath against their forefathers for crucifying the Lord of glory, shall come and worship that Saviour, of whom, even yet they are ignorant. Oh, how will they come before him? not like their fathers, in mock respect, bowing the knee, and saying, "hail, king of the Jews;" as much as to say, "let us see what will become of his dreams," but in heartfelt acknowledgment of their misery and his mercy; of their offence being indeed in itself unpardonable, and yet of his love being large, and wide, and deep enough to take them all in, and receive them into favor.

LECTURES ON THE HISTORY OF THE
CHRISTIAN CHURCH.

BY THE REV. RICHARD BURGESS, B. D.
Rector of Upper Chelsea.

(SECOND SERIES.-SECT. I.)

Introduction to the series-View of the Christian Churches at the death of St. John-State of Christianity under Trajan, as exhibited in his correspondence with Pliny-Exemplary fortitude of the Christians of Pontus and Bithynia, and other things de

ducible from the above-named correspondence-Blessed conse

quences of the faithfulness of the early saints.

the gospel, properly speaking, has to deal; and it is THERE is but one subject with which the preacher of comprised in that faithful saying, viz., "that Christ Jesus came into the world to save sinners." But inasmuch as this comprehensive saying must be developed and adapted, as far as may be, to the various capacities of men, in order that it may operate with greater power upon their unruly wills and affections, it is expedient to unfold and elucidate its meaning by every minor subject which may be fairly brought to bear upon its manifold contents. The great apostle of the Gentiles was determined to know nothing amongst his converts, save Jesus Christ, and him crucified; yet he employed a great variety of arguments for the purpose of shutting up his brethren to the faith; and when he stood in the midst of Mars' hill, with the inhe did not disdain to use as a text, an inscription on a Pagan altar, nor thought it derogatory to cite a passage from a heathen poet; but the same apostle exhorts

tent of unfolding the same mystery of redeeming love,

nealogies which minister questions rather than godly edifying which is in faith. The path, therefore to be followed in this case, may, I think, be clearly marked out; it lies between a formal system of delivering after some novel mode of recommending it on the God's truth on the one hand, and a constant stirring other. There is surely no reason, as science and knowledge of all kinds advance in society, why the minister of the gospel should not make them subserve the preaching of the Cross. Now, it is not that I am about to lead my readers to the contemplation of God's holy mysteries through the medium of philosophy, except the history of Christ's church teaching us by its example may be so called, but the observations I have now made, will tend to show the utility of our present subject if properly fitted to the source of all truth. We may borrow from the page of history, especially the history of the Christian church, whatever light it is calculated to throw upon the dealings of God with his people; we may go in quest of every ray of light which is scattered centrate it upon the source of our salvation: and it is upon this principle that I would now pursue the history of Christian doctrine beyond the records of inspiration.

Finally, we find that Joseph's administra-Timothy not to give heed to fables and endless getion did not cease until by means of the provision of corn that he had made, he actually brought the whole land of Egypt into entire subjection to Pharoah-the whole land, the whole people, and all that they had, became the king's-than was the whole work completed His brethren in the land of Goshen, -the best of the land-the Egyptians in all the rest of the country, subject to his power, and happy under his dominion, and he the author of their happiness, nay, the means of their very existence, and the ruler over them all. What is this but a faint shadow of the final consummation of all things; "when all the kingdoms of the world shall become the kingdoms of God and of his Christ?" When the Jews shall be restored to favor, and the fulness of the Gentiles shall be come in"when Christ shall be all and in all." These glorious times are still future, but they are But because we we must take leave of the clearly foretold; they may not be far off: it scriptures as an historical guide, our interest for the is our duty to be ever waiting for them, church of Christ is not on that account to cease. We looking onward to them, and above all, preare equally concerned in the lives and sufferings of paring for them, that when Jesus does thus the true believers who succeeded the apostolic age. The same grace that was effectual in the one wrought come and takes his great power, and reigns also in the other. The same consolations, the same over the world, we may be his faithful sub-conflicts with the world, the flesh, and devil, were ex

around the circle of Christ's fold, providing we con

perienced by both, and in all succeeding time the people of God have, in like manner, been the objects of divine favour. Hence we read, in the words of Christ himself," Neither pray I for these alone; but for them also, which shall believe in me, through their word;" and if they (the followers and successors of the apostles) were made the special object of the Redeemer's prayer, then it cannot be a matter of indifference to us to ascertain, if we can, their character and their condition whilst on earth: for their union with the Father and with his Son Jesus Christ, their close and spiritual communion, was to be to the unbelieving world at once a sign and a condemnation, "That they all may be one," continues the Redeemer, 66 as thou, Father, art in me, and I in thee, that they also may be one in us, that the world may believe that thou hast sent me."

In

I have said that the voice of inspiration ceased with St. John. It was during his exile in an island in the Egean Sea that he wrote the book of Revelation which closes the canon of the New Testament. that book we learn something of the state of the churches in Asia; and we appear, in reading the subsequent pages, to be only reading a history of what has happened in the church since that period. It is said, and with some appearance of truth, that St. John profited by the edict which the emperor Nerva promulgated in favour of the Christians; and went out from his place of exile to Ephesus, where he died. This took place at the very end of the first century; and it is from this period that we are now about to resume the history of the Christian church.

During the last thirty years of the first century we know little or nothing of any of the apostles except St. John. It is very probable they were all taken away from their earthly labours about the time of Nero's persecution; but, inasmuch as St. John remained alive until the very end of the century, it is with propriety called the apostolic age. The succeeding century saw many bishops and martyrs who had been the disciples of St. John and the other apostles; and the writings of some of those have come down to us: the second century is, therefore, sometimes called the age of the apostolic fathers.

In viewing the interesting events connected with Christ's church, we are naturally led to a two-fold inquiry: how it fared with the world into which, as a lamb among wolves, it was sent; and what evils, or remarkable events, arose within itself. These two views may be distinguished by the external and internal history of the church. To the former, the heathens may bear testimony, and their evidence must be the most unsuspected; the latter can only be gathered from the Christian writers, and they must be divested of all passion and party, to adopt their testimony as to the truth of doctrine. The death of St. John was nearly contemporary with the accession of Trajan to the Roman empire, which took place in the year 98. Considering, therefore, the first century as closing with these two events, respectively belonging to the church and the Roman world, we may take our review of Christianity at the beginning of the second century.

From the sacred writings alone, without having recourse to any less authentic records, we learn that the the religion of Jesus had gained a footing in fifty different towns and cities of the Roman empire, besides the churches which were spread over about twenty different countries. It will hardly suffice to limit its extent in the East by the great river Euphrates; for the Elamites and the dwellers in Mesopotamia go beyond. We may safely extend the knowledge of the gospel, at the close of the first century, to the Persian Gulph and the Caspian Sea: the whole of Asia Minor, with Syria, Palestine, and Lower Egypt, had shared in a large degree its benign influence; and we shall shortly see, from the most indubitable testimony, how

mightily the word of God prevailed among the nations bordering on the shores of the Euxine Sea. St. Paul tells us that round about, even to Illyricum, he had fully preached the kingdom of God; and he informs Timothy, in his second epistle, that Titus had gone to Dalmatia. These intimations lead us on to follow the footsteps of Christianity almost to the banks of the Danube, comprising a large portion of what is now the Austrian territory, along the Hadriatic Sea, without mentioning the islands in the Mediterranean, where we know there were Christians. We may, upon the same infallible authority, pass from the East to the West. The intention which St. Paul announced to the Romans of passing into Spain, induces us to believe that either then, or soon after, there were churches in that country. The faith of the Romans was spoken of throughout all the world; and the saints of Italy is an expression which surely comprises other churches than that at Rome. There is certainly no intimation in scripture that Christianity had penetrated beyond the Alps. We find it there, however, in the churches of Vienne and Lyons about the middle of the second century; and there is no reason to suppose that the converted Jews, which came from Cyrene and other parts of Africa, did not carry the seeds of the new religion even to the shores of Numidia. But if these facts may be gathered from the scriptures, that is to say, if such was the extent of Christianity before the destruction of Jerusalem, we are safe in assigning it no narrower limits at the beginning of the second century.

The banner of the cross is seen to wave over the then known three quarters of the globe; the commission of our Lord, which he gave to the humble fishermen to go into all the world and preach the gospel, was fully accomplished. Their sound went out into all lands. There was neither barbarian nor Scythian, bond nor free, all were invited to come to the waters of life; the most abject of the human race were admitted to the glorious privileges of the gospel. The divine word was suited to the cases of the weary and heavy laden; the exhortations to the worst of sinners were brief but effectual. Wash and be clean; believe in the Lord Jesus Christ, and thou shalt be saved. Thus was the church of God, in its universal character, established upon earth; thus was it left to bear witness to all the world that God had visited mankind, and that the Sun of righteousness had risen upon the benighted race of men, with healing in his wings.

In this condition of the world and the church, Trajan, a native of Spain, and a great warrior, took possession of the empire in the forty-second year of his age. It does not appear at this period that any law remained in force against the Christians. The senate had annulled the cruel edicts of Nero, and the mild administration of Nerva had effaced the inhuman laws of Domitian. We may easily imagine that the faithful followers of Jesus suffered from the occasional ebullitions of popular fury, which the laws were either too feeble or ill adapted to repress; and it was no doubt on some such occasion that Pliny wrote his celebrated letter to the emperor, which, with the answer, we are now about to consider. You will recollect that St. Peter addresses his epistles to "the strangers scattered throughout Pontus, Galatia, Cappadocia, Asia, and Bithynia." In this expression we readily discover that a few Christians, taking refuge from persecution in those distant provinces of the empire, where they might serve their God and Saviour in peace, were dispersed, like the seeds which are carried away by the violence of the storm, over the whole of the lesser Asia. It is evident they were then but few in number; but before another half-century expired, they were sufficiently numerous to cause anxiety to the Roman governor. In the year 107, but certainly not later than 111, Pliny the younger, as he is usually called, was appointed by Trajan governor of Pontus and

Bithynia; and, in the course of his administration, he found it necessary to consult the emperor, who was then at Rome, upon the alarining increase of what he termed a superstition. The letter which he wrote, and the answer of Trajan, have both come down to us; and are justly regarded as the most important external evidences of the character and influence of Christianity. The governor of those countries, where, fifty years previous, a few strangers who believed in the Lord Jesus, were scattered, thus writes to the master of the Roman world: "It is my constant custom to consult thee in all matters concerning which I have any doubt: for who can better direct me where I hesitate, or instruct me where I am ignorant? I have never been present at any trials of Christians, so that I know not well what is the subject matter of punishment, or of inquiry; or what strictness ought to be used in either. Nor have I been a little perplexed to determine whether any difference ought to be made upon account of age, or whether the young and tender, and full grown and robust, ought to be treated alike; whether repentance should entitle to pardon, or whether all who have once been Christians ought to be punished, though they are now no longer so; whether the name itself, although no crimes be detected, or crimes only belonging to the name, ought to be punished. Concerning all these things I am in doubt. In the mean time, I have taken this course with all who have been brought before me, and have been accused as Christians. I have put the question to them, whether they were Christians: upon their confessing to me that they were, I repeated the question a second and a third time, threatening also to punish with death; such as still persisted, ordered away to be punished; for it was no doubt with me, whatever might be the nature of their opinion, that contumacy and inflexible obstinacy ought to be punished. There were others of the same infatuation, whom, because they are Roman citizens, I have noted down to be sent to the city."

"In a short time," continues Pliny, "the crime spreading itself even whilst under persecution, as is usual in such cases, divers sorts of people came in my way; the information was presented to me without mention ing the author, containing the names of many persons, who, upon examination, denied that they were Christians, or had ever been so. They repeated after me an invocation of the Gods, and made supplication with wine and frankincense to thy image, which for that purpose I had caused to be brought and set before them, together with the statues of the deities. Moreover they reviled the name of Christ, none of which things, as is said, they who are really Christians can by any means be compelled to do. These, therefore, I thought proper to discharge. Others were named by an informer, who at first confessed themselves Christians, and afterwards denied it; the rest said they had been Christians but had left them, some three years ago, some longer, and one or two above twenty years; they all worshipped thy image and the statues of the gods; these also reviled Christ. They affirmed that the whole of their fault, or error lay in this, that they were accustomed to meet together on a stated day, before it was light, to join in a set form of words (or, it might also be rendered, to sing a hymn) addressed to Christ as to God; they also entered into a sacred obligation which had no criminal tendency, but only bound them not to steal or commit adultery, or break their word, or refuse to restore anything entrusted to them; when this was over they were in the habit of breaking up until they met again to partake of a common meal at which persons of all ranks attended, but in a harmless manner. But this they had forbore since the publication of my edict, by which, according to thy commands, I prohibited assemblies.

"After receiving this account I judged it the more necessary to examine, and that by torture, two female attendants, which are called deaconesses, but I dis

covered nothing more except a bad and excessive superstition. Suspending, therefore, all judicial proceedings, I have recourse to thee for advice; for it has appeared unto me a matter highly deserving of consideration, especially upon account of the great number of persons who are in danger of suffering, for many of all ages and every rank, of both sexes, likewise are accused, and will be accused, nor has the contagion of this superstition seized cities only but the lesser towns also, and the open country. Nevertheless it seems to me that it may be restrained and corrected. It is certain that the temples which were almost forsaken begin to be more frequented, and the sacred solemnities after a long intermission are revived; victims likewise are every where bought up, whereas for some time there were few purchasers; whence it is easy to imagine what numbers of men might be reclaimed if pardon were granted to those who shall repent."

To this letter of the pro-prætor the emperor briefly replies:

"Thou hast done as thou oughtest in thy proceedings with those who have been brought before thee as Christians, for it is impossible to establish any one rule that shall hold universally. They are not to be sought for; if any are brought before thee, and are convicted, they ought to be punished. However, he that denies his being a Christian, and makes it evident in fact, that is by supplicating to our gods, though he be suspected to have been so formerly, let him be pardoned upon repentance, but in no case of any crime whatever may an anonymous information be received, for that would be a dangerous precedent, and unworthy of the age in which I govern."

These documents which, from their importance to our subject, and their undoubted authenticity, I have not scrupled to lay before the reader in full, have, as you may easily imagine, ever excited great interest among the writers of ecclesiastical history; they were first referred to by Tertullian and Eusebius, who wrote in the third and fourth centuries respectively, and they have merited the observation of all subsequent apologists for Christianity; we shall be content with deducing from them a few facts which may serve to elucidate this period of the church. The name of Christian appears to have been well known when Pliny addressed the emperor, for he does not say he had met with a class of persons so called, but mentions them in a manner which shows that such a sect was well known in the Roman world. Besides this intimation of the extent of Christianity at that time, he further affirms that the temples of the gods, in the provinces over which he had rule, were abandoned, and there were scarcely any purchasers of victims to be found. So mightily, as I before observed, had the word of God prevailed within fifty years along the shores of the Euxine Sea. We learn further the firmness and constancy of those believers, such as had really known the love of God in Christ, for even the Pagan witness shows that the apostates had never been properly engrafted into the body of Christ's Church; and that some who professed Christ, afterwards in the time of temptation, reviled him, which was conformable to the prediction of Christ himself; we further learn that even twenty years previous to this period, some in those countries had made profession of Christianity; and look how near this testimony closes with the apostolic writings: their assemblies were held, according to the witness of the apostates, before day-break; this shows how careful they were not to give unnecessary and open offence to the existing laws-for ever since the suppression of certain nightly assemblies at Rome, about 200 years before the Christian era, all private meetings of a religious nature were looked upon with suspicion by the magistrates. It further appears from Pliny's letter, that a certain day of the week, which was, no doubt, the Sunday, was especially consecrated

for these religious purposes among those primitive believers; that is among those whose fathers had seen St. Peter, or at least received his autograph espistles; and we may not omit to observe that the evidence which the apostates gave in to the pro-prætor contains a pointed allusion to the divinity of Christ, to whom they addressed their prayers and praises as to God; nor ought it to escape our notice how the true Christian in every age hath, by well-doing, put to silence the ignorance of foolish men, so that even a heathen is compelled to admire the holiness of the vow by which the Christians of Bithynia were bound, and to suspend his persecutions of a harmless and innocent people.

The rescript of the emperor is not less important in following up the history of the Christians: for, as Tillemont well observes, it was the rule of action to the Romans until the persecution of Severus; so that the whole Christian world was affected by whatever it might allow of or forbid to be done against them. We would not deny that it softened the former rigour with which the saints of God had been treated; but it admitted, at the same time, of persecution, even unto death. The only thing required was the full proof of being a Christian; and this the true believer was ever ready to confess, because it is part of the profession of Christianity to confess Christ before men; and no man, who believes in him, is even justified in concealing the matter; for no man, it is said, lighteth a candle and putteth it under a bushel, but rather on a candlestick, that every one that cometh in may see the light. If, then, the envious priests of the false gods saw their temples deserted; if the venders of victims and incense, and the makers of idols, saw their gains diminish, they might easily avail themselves of the imperial edicts, and bring to trial the true defenders of the faith; and accordingly we find, in pursuing our history, that within a short time after Trajan's answer to his deputy, two distinguished leaders in the church were put to a cruel and ignominious death. The first of these was Simeon, who succeeded the apostle St. James as bishop of the church of Jerusalem. Some writers are indeed disposed to date his martyrdom a few years earlier than the return of Trajan's rescript to Bithynia; but, without entering into any critical arrangement of this and such matters, I shall continue to state what appears to me the most accurate chronology.

Simeon was the son of Cleophas and of Mary, and cousin-german of Jesus Christ. He was 120 years old when he was taken before Atticus, the Roman governor of Syria. The emperors had taken some pains to exterminate the posterity of David, in order to take away all pretext of rebellion from the Jews. Some enemies, both false-professing Christians and Jews, gave information against Simeon that he was a Christian, and, moreover, that he was of the lineage of David. He was tortured for many days, so that the people wondered, and the governor was astonished, to witness so much strength and capability of suffering in so aged a man. He was at length nailed to a cross, and died, after having governed the Church of Jerusalem for more than forty years. He witnessed the destruction of the once favoured city, and he must have been amongst those who, in obedience to the forewarning of Christ, fled to the mountains. How eventful the life of this holy man! How faithful he was unto death! He was succeeded by Justus, a native of Judea, whose competitor for the dignity of governing the church was Tebutes; he, being rejected, became the author of a sect which comprised all those unsound believers who inclined to Judaism, and who in all probability were afterwards blended in the general appellation of the Gnostics.

The church of Alexandria is said to have been first governed by St. Mark; to him, according to Eusebius, succeeded Anianus, who died in the year 85.

[ocr errors]

Abilicus and Cerdon go through a further space of 24 years, and then Primus succeeds, which carries us into the reign of Hadrian. Little is known of the internal state of Alexandria until a later period, when it became too fruitful in subjects of a speculative nature. But the church of Antioch acquires a great interest at this period, from the affecting narrative which ecclesiastical history has preserved of St. Ignatius. That holy man had succeeded Evodius, who, in all probability, received the flock at Antioch from the hands of St. Peter. He had survived with St. John the persecution under Domitian; and when Trajan passed through Antioch, he must have been far advanced in years. Whether the conversation which in the Acts of the Martyrs he is said to have had with Trajan be worthy of credit or not, it seems sufficiently clear, from other sources of information, that Ignatius did see the emperor as he passed through Antioch; and upon the principle of sending all distinguished or remarkable culprits to suffer at Rome, Ignatius, as the principal leader of the Christians in the East, was condemned to be exposed to the wild beasts in that very amphitheatre whose stupendous ruins now excite our wonder and admiration. It is probable that Trajan had no more to do in this act than merely giving his consent to the request of others, made upon a subject which he had neither leisure nor inclination to consider. Occupied with his distant war in Parthia, and exercised by the rude valour of the Dacians, he can hardly be supposed to have bestowed much thought upon an aged follower of the meek and lowly Jesus. But this will not justify him before that tribunal which shall one day be erected in the clouds of heaven; and although his military achievements have been conveyed, through seventeen centuries, by the eloquence of art, and his matchless pillar still remains to tell us of his earthly glory, the blood of the aged martyr will cry against him from the encumbered arena, long after the sculptured marble has ceased to be intelligible. Ignatius, being condemned to death, was committed to a guard of ten soldiers, who appear to have treated him with great severity. They embarked at Seleucia, and came to Smyrna, where Polycarp, the fellow-disciple of Inguatius, was bishop of the church. The two servants of Christ met and comforted one another in this day of adversity. Deputies from all the neighbouring churches came to confer with the venerable martyr, and amongst them are enumerated Onesimus, bishop of Ephesus, Polybius, bishop of Tralles, and Demas, from Magnesia. They came, it is said, in the hope that he would communicate to them some spiritual gift, which perhaps shows that preternatural gifts, although rare, were not altogether extinct.

Ignatius took the opportunity of writing from Smyrna to the three churches over which these bishops presided; having found also at Smyrna some Ephesians, who were going directly to Rome, he wrote a fourth epistle to the Romans. He speaks of the joy he shall experience in seeing them face to face, beseeches them not to be sorrowful on his account, nor to prevent him from obtaining the crown of martyrdom, and with many exhortations, he entreats them to love one another. He makes no mention of the bishop of Rome in his epistle; but some suppose it was Evarestus who had succeeded Clement in the year 100. From Smyrna, Ignatius was conveyed to Troas, where he was met by the bishop of Philadelphia. He became the bearer of an epistle which was addressed to the Christians in that city. He also took the opportunity of writing to the Christians of Smyrna, whom he had recently left full of sorrow at his departure, and for the words which, like St. Paul, he had spoken, that they should see his face no more. added also a letter to Polycarp, recommending him to feed the flock over which the Holy Ghost had made him overseer.

He

These seven epistles, written by Ignatius at this trying period of his life, are still extant, and acknowledged by all to be genuine. They are for the most part short, and rather contain exhortations and precepts than an argumentative exposition of Christian faith. As the disciple of the apostles, and as a man full of piety, we may perhaps consider the writings as the most interesting documents the church possesses, next to the writings of the apostles. They are in perfect harmony with the sacred scriptures; but the churches, however valuing them as the production of a bishop and martyr, placed them far beneath the infallible word of inspiration.

There are other five epistles ascribed to Ignatius, said also to have been written during his journey; but these have as satisfactorily been shown by the learned to be spurious, as the seven short epistles have been proved to be genuine. We are indebted for the pub

lication of them to Isaac Vossius, who discovered them in a manuscript at Florence, and gave them to the world in 1646.

The venerable martyr proceeded from Troas, ac

companied by three of his disciples, and following the course which Paul had taken in his first journey to Greece, they landed at Neapolis. They passed through Macedonia, touching at Philippi, until they came to Epidamnus, now Durazzo, situated on the Hadriatic Sea. From thence they re-embarked and came to the shores of Italy, arriving within sight of Puteoli, near Naples, where St. Paul landed on his way to Rome. Ignatius desired to tread in the footsteps of the great apostle, and land at Pozzuoli; but a contrary wind prevented the execution of the design, and after a day and night they came to Portus, which is now Frumicino. Thence they proceeded to Rome, and great was the joy of the Christians in conferring

with the aged servant of Christ. But this was not of long duration, for the festival of the Sigillaria, which lasted seven days, was now nearly finished, and Ignatins was destined to be a spectacle for those hours of brutal festivity. On the 21st of December he was led into the arena, and was speedily devoured by the wild beasts let loose upon him. He had requested that none should gather up his relics; nevertheless a few of the larger bones which the wild beasts had spared were collected and carried to Antioch; and they are spoken of by the martyr's friends as an "invaluable treasure." They were buried in the cemetery, which was near to the gate called Daphne. This mar

tyrdom took place in the year 107, when Sura and

Senecio were consuls.

ages, as we shall hardly, at present, step beyond the limits of the second century.

THE SABBATH ADAPTED TO THE NECESSITIES OF MAN:

A Sermon,*

BY THE REV. S. N. KINGDON, B.D.
Fellow of Sidney Sussex College, Cambridge.
GEN. ii. 3.

And God blessed the seventh day, and sanctified it : because that on it he had rested from all his work which God created and made.

WHEN we are distinctly told that God, after six days employed in the frame-work of creation, rested on the seventh day, and sanctified it, we are not warranted to imagine that he, to whom we ascribe the attribute of omnipotence, was confined, as respects himself, to any portion of time, in the fulfilment of his work that six days were more suitable than one, or one than six, to the operation of his almighty power. Nor are we able to discern how his rest on the seventh day is connected with any thing immediately referable to himself, or merely calculated to illustrate his own character and attributes. There is a significant expressiveness in the manner in which, after the employments of six days had been specified, the seventh is ushered in as consecrated by Jehovah to a holy rest. But the solemn announcement of his procedure in this particular, seems only to be understood upon the supposition that, knowing the importance of rest from labour during one day in seven to the creatures he had formed, he chose to take the striking method of sanctioning by his own example, the cessation so necessary to be observed.

Assuming the view just stated to be the correct one, we should expect to find in the Sabbath, some striking adaptation to the naOur review of Christianity in the reign of Trajan istural constitution of mankind; and it will scarcely complete if we omit to mention the church at be no small argument that it is the correct Rome. For if Jerusalem, Antioch, and Alexandria one, if we can show by strong evidence that such an adaptation to our physical and moral necessities, is one of the most prominent features of that ordinance.

were the metropolitan churches of the East, Rome must have held that station in the West. Clement, the fellow labourer of St. Paul, is supposed by some to have been the fourth bishop, if Linus was the second, and Anaclete the third; but although ecclesiastical history has preserved accounts of many of the Eastern churches, it has handed down little more about the bishops of Rome for the first two centuries

than their mere names, and those in an order so con

fused that both Petavius and Onophrius (writers of the Roman Catholic Church), complain of the obscure succession of the bishops of Rome for 180 years. Many of them no doubt suffered, like Ignatius, for the cause of the gospel, as for instance Telesphorus; and there is every reason to suppose that the errors and heresies which infected the Christian churches in Asia

and Egypt did not obtain a place in the primitive church of Rome. Ignatius was a negative testimony to this in his epistle to that church; for although in his other epistles he alludes to deceivers and false teachers, he makes no such allusion to any as being then amongst the Romans; nor will it be our business to enquire whether any such errors arose in subsequent

I would then, endeavour, by the divine blessing, to illustrate the force and scope of my text, by directing attention to some of the most remarkable particulars in which the institution of the Sabbath meets the requirements of man.

Among others which might be enumerated, I would notice

I. First the manner in which it conduces to the healthy, and, consequently, most advantageous exercise of our bodily and mental faculties.

No one, who attentively considers the bodily frame, whether of man himself or of * Preached before the University.

« הקודםהמשך »