through Chrift:-the dead fhall rife through Chrift first: i. e. before the living are caught up. There is an oppofition between TрWтоV and ETTET. E hath frequently this fenfe. See John xiii. 35.' πρωτον επειτα. The learned Reader, from this fpecimen, will form no unfavourable opinion of the Author's abilities for the task he hath undertaken. We think, however, that he might have selected with more propriety fome other Epiftle of St. Paul, in order to have given more fubftantial proofs of his critical skill and acutenefs. In the Epiftle he hath chofen the difficulties are fo few, that they may be furmounted without any extraordinary efforts. of ingenuity, learning, or judgment. Mr. Wakefield's fcrupulous attention to the Greek Articles is, frequently affected and it often gives the appearance of ftiff. nefs and formality to his tranflation. Nothing is gained by it in point of fenfe and fomething is often loft in point of eafe and fimplicity. Paul and Sylvanus, and Timothy, unto the Church of Theffalonians' - instead of the Theffalonians, is an aukward expreffion. The pretence of precifion will not recompenfe for the omiffion of the common particle. We feel the defect; the verfe limps, and the ear is diffatisfied. B..d..k. ART. V. An Essay on the Nature and Existence of the Material World. 8vo. 3 s. fewed. Becket. 1781. THIS HIS controverfy, though for a time it engaged the atten-, tion of the Public, chiefly through the popular name and great abilities of Dr. Prieftley, yet being of a nature too abftrue to entertain, and too equivocal to be decided, hath funk into neglect; nor do we imagine it in the power of wit, ingenuity, or learning, to revive its confequence, or again awaken the curiofity which it at firft excited. Metaphyfics have no charms for the "million." A strange paradox may raise a foolish wonder; and when it was given out, that Dr. Priestley had written a very learned treatife to prove that man had no foul, many were eager to fee how he established his doctrine; but, having purchafed his book, could not com prehend his reafonings, or found them fo abftrufe as to require more study than they had either time or inclination to bestow on them. As fome were tired of the "Difquifitions" be cause they yielded no amufement to the idle and frivolous; to others were difappointed by them, because they afforded no fanction for vice, and no confolation for infidelity. Though Dr. Prieftley's metaphyfics made him bold, they did not make him fceptical: and though they induced him to reject the dogmas of the schools, they did not make him flight the difcoveries of the Gospel. Ee 3 The The very ingenious and acute Author of the prefent Effay is a warm advocate for metaphyfical ftudies; and hopes, from the popularity which these studies have lately gained, that the dif grace which generally attends them will be wiped off. But notwithstanding the Author hath enlivened the fubject by a vein of wit, and cloathed it in very agreeable language, yet we are perfuaded that even his Effay will have the fate of most of the other pieces that have been published in this inaufpicious controverfy. It is the purpose of this effay to fet afide matter as one great fource of confufion. The ideal fyftem,' fays the Writer, is accounted an hypothefis unsupported by facts. I adopt it from the opinion, that it is the only fyftem of metaphyfics that contains nothing hypothetical; and give it my fupport because of the modefty of its pretenfions: never outftepping experience, and remaining in ignorance and doubt where this fails.' This Effay is addreffed to Dr. Priestley and Dr. Price, and the opinions of both, concerning MATTER, are combated with great fhrewdnefs and ingenuity. In attempting to expofe the abfurdity and contradiction of Pr. Briefly's hypothefis, he remarks, that according to the genuine principles of it, when fairly examined, and fifted to the bottom, it contains the following conclufions, viz. That the fubjects on which motion operates are phyfical points; that the bodies to be moved are motion itself; and that the external matter he fo ftrenuoufly contends for, is no more than fyftems of agency without a fubject whereon to act. On the impoffibility of reconciling these contradictions, our Author pushes Dr. Priestley with this alternative, viz, either to admit the real exiftence and folidity of matter; or that there is no matter at all. The dilemma, tays he, is unavoidable.' We will fum up the Author's arguments in fupport of his immaterial fcheme, by the following analyfis of them, founded on the nature of fenfation, which may be confidered as the bafis of his reafonings against the exiftence of a material world. I. No property of matter can refemble fenfation, otherwise fuch property of matter would poffefs fenfation. II. It appears in fact that they do not poffefs it. (1.) Scents and founds do not refemble their refpective causes, but are referable to motion. (2.) Colour is reduceable to the fame; and likewife (3.) folidity, or hardness. (4.) Figure, as difcernible either by fight or touch, is known only by a variety of ideas or impreffions being included in one perception. In the conclufion, the Author fays, Like a true fage, I have endeavoured to point out the truth; to place it on an immoveable bafis, and feparate it from the idle fancies by which mankind are led aftray. But though it belongs to the fage to utter the the documents of truth, conviction depends upon capacity, and On this Effay we can only beftow the general praife of great truth may be found, or whether it may be found on either. Bad..k. * ART. VI. The Library. A Poem. 4to. 2 s. Dodfley. 1781. N the reflections with which this well-written poem com- • Not Hope herself, with her old flattering art, And anxious fearches for congenial cares; Those lenient cares, which, with our own combin'd, And steal our grief away, and leave their own behind; But what ftrange art, what magic can dispose Ee 4 * Written by the Rev. George } Where Crabbe: Where mental wealth the poor in thought may find, See here the balms that paffion's wounds affwage, And round the heart, and o'er the aching head, To follow this agreeable and intelligent guide through all the Now turn from thefe, to view yon ampler fpace, There might they long in lafting peace abide, ..... But controverfial authors lie befide, Who friend from friend and fire from fon divide: Peace in their looks, and vengeance in their pen. Lo! how they ftretch their gloomy wings around, And each, like Jonas, is difpleas'd, if God } There is another race of beings to whom the Reader will like • But who are these? Methinks a noble mien, Hence, Hence, ye prophane! I feel a former dread, Ah! happy he who thus in magic themes, But loft, for ever loft, to me thefe joys, Which Reafon fcatters, and which Time deftroys; My doughty Giants all are flain or fled, And all my Knights, blue, green, and yellow, dead; Light flumbers vanish from the clouded eyes; And pain and prudence make and mar the man.' After the fpecimens that have been given, to fay what our fentiments are of this performance would be needlefs. The Reader will perceive it is the production of no common pen. |