Taking Back Our Streets Act of 1995: Hearings Before the Subcommittee on Crime of the Committee on the Judiciary, House of Representatives, One Hundred Fourth Congress, First Session, on H.R. 3 ... January 19 and 20, 1995U.S. Government Printing Office, 1996 - 602 עמודים Distributed to some depository libraries in microfiche. |
מהדורות אחרות - הצג הכל
מונחים וביטויים נפוצים
abuse Bill McCollum block grant BOLELYN capital Chairman committed committee Congress constitutional convicted cops costs counsel crime bill Crime Control crime policy crime prevention criminal justice system death penalty Dilulio drug courts effect evidence exclusionary rule Federal court federal habeas Federal judges felony filing Fourth Amendment funds GEBELEIN going good-faith exception habeas corpus hearing HEINEMAN incarceration inmates inner-city issue JACKSON LEE January 19 kids law enforcement legislation litigation LOFGREN LUNGREN mayor MCCANN MCCOLLUM ment murder neighborhood offenders parole percent person petition Philadelphia police officers prevention programs prison cap problem problem-oriented policing prosecution prosecutors question reasonable mistake exception reduce crime reform require restitution SCHMIDT SCHUMER SCOTT sentence statute street subcommittee subsection Supreme Court Thank tion U.S. Supreme Court United United States Code victims violent crime warrant YACKLE youth
קטעים בולטים
עמוד 349 - In sum, the rule is a judicially created remedy designed to safeguard Fourth Amendment rights generally through its deterrent effect, rather than a personal constitutional right of the party aggrieved.
עמוד 345 - There are those who say, as did Justice (then Judge) Cardozo, that under our constitutional exclusionary doctrine "[t]he criminal is to go free because the constable has blundered.
עמוד 353 - The value of capital punishment as a deterrent of crime is a complex factual issue the resolution of which properly rests with the legislatures, which can evaluate the results of statistical studies in terms of their own local conditions and with a flexibility of approach that is not available to the courts.
עמוד 409 - What happens to a dream deferred? Does it dry up like a raisin in the sun? Or fester like a sore — And then run? Does it stink like rotten meat? Or crust and sugar over — like a syrupy sweet? Maybe it just sags like a heavy load. Or does it explode?
עמוד 353 - We conclude that the marginal or nonexistent benefits produced by suppressing evidence obtained in objectively reasonable reliance on a subsequently invalidated search warrant cannot justify the substantial costs of exclusion.
עמוד 412 - Vaclav Havel, President of the Czech Republic, has written of the •butterfly effect": It is a belief that everything in the world is so mysteriously and comprehensively interconnected that a slight, seemingly insignificant wave of a butterfly's wing in a single spot on this planet can unleash a typhoon thousands of miles away. We are not certain about typhoons far away, but, in the inner city, interconnectedness is not at all mysterious in successful programs for children and youth. Most of the...
עמוד 299 - The problem is that the inevitability of factual, legal, and moral error gives us a system that we know must wrongly kill some defendants, a system that fails to deliver the fair, consistent, and reliable sentences of death required by the Constitution.
עמוד 371 - ... also insisted upon as an essential ingredient of the right newly recognized by the Wolf case. In short, the admission of the new constitutional right by Wolf could not consistently tolerate denial of its most important constitutional privilege, namely, the exclusion of the evidence which an accused had been forced to give by reason of the unlawful seizure. To hold otherwise is to grant the right but in reality to withhold its privilege and enjoyment.
עמוד 452 - It would be hard to imagine that society could find a higher yield for a dollar of investment than that found in preschool programs for its at-risk children. Every $1.00 spent on early prevention and intervention can save $4.75 in the costs of remedial education, welfare, and crime further down the road.
עמוד 373 - Nor would an officer manifest objective good faith in relying on a warrant based on an affidavit so lacking in indicia of probable cause as to render official belief in its existence entirely unreasonable.