מה אומרים אנשים - כתיבת ביקורת
לא מצאנו ביקורות במקומות הרגילים
מהדורות אחרות - הצג הכל
action actually allow amendment annulled apparently appeal apply argument asserted attempt attitude authority Bank branch called Chief Justice citizens Civil claimed clause Cleveland commerce concerned Congress consequently consideration considered constitution contract decided decision declared determine discussion District doctrine doubt duty effect enacted executive exercise expressed fact federal given held hence Howard important Includes indicated individual instances interest involved issue judges judgment judicial judiciary jurisdiction jury Kentucky Large latter legislative legislature limited Maryland means ment mentioned Michigan municipal nature nullify officer Ohio opinion original Orleans particular party passed Pennsylvania Peters political position preceding present principle probably protection question Railroad reasons refused regarding rendered respect ruling statute supra Supreme Court Tenn territory Texas tion tribunal unconstitutional Union United validity violation Virginia void Wall Wheaton York
עמוד 54 - The question, whether a law be void for its repugnancy to the constitution is, at all times, a question of much delicacy, which ought seldom, if ever, to be decided in the affirmative, in a doubtful case.
עמוד 43 - The question whether an act repugnant to the Constitution can become the law of the land is a question deeply interesting to the United States; but, happily, not of an intricacy proportioned to its interest. It seems only necessary to recognize certain principles supposed to have been long and well established to decide it.
עמוד 61 - It is but a decent respect due to the wisdom, the integrity, and the patriotism of the legislative body by which any law is passed, to presume in favor of its validity, until its violation of the constitution is proved beyond all reasonable doubt.
עמוד 41 - Thus, the particular phraseology of the Constitution of the United States confirms and strengthens the principle, supposed to be essential to all written constitutions, that a law repugnant to the Constitution is void; and that courts, as well as other departments, are bound by that instrument.
עמוד 52 - If any act of Congress, or of the Legislature of a state, violates those constitutional provisions, it is unquestionably void; though, I admit, that as the authority to declare it void is of a delicate and awful nature, the Court will never resort to that authority, but in a clear and urgent case.
עמוד 39 - What is a Constitution? It is the form of government, delineated by the mighty hand of the people, in which certain fixed principles of fundamental laws are established. The Constitution is certain and fixed ; it contains the permanent will of the people, and is the supreme law of the land ; it is paramount to the power of the legislature and can be revoked or altered only by the authority that made it.
עמוד 89 - It is State action of a particular character that is prohibited. Individual invasion of individual rights is not the subject matter of the amendment. It has a deeper and broader scope. It nullifies and makes void all State legislation, and State action of every kind, which impairs the privileges and immunities of citizens of the United States, or which injures them in life, liberty, or property without due process of law, or which denies to any of them the equal protection of the laws.
עמוד 90 - ... the one pervading purpose found in them all, lying at the foundation of each, and without which none of them would have been even suggested; we mean the freedom of the slave race, the security and firm establishment of that freedom, and the protection of the newly-made freeman and citizen from the oppressions of those who had formerly exercised unlimited dominion over him.
עמוד 57 - No tribunal can approach such a question without a deep sense of its importance, and of the awful responsibility involved in its decision. But it must be decided peacefully, or remain a source of hostile legislation, perhaps of hostility of a still more serious nature; and if it is to be so decided, by this tribunal alone can the decision be made.
עמוד 72 - The idea that any legislature, state or Federal, can conclusively determine for the people and for the courts that what it enacts in the form of law. or what it authorizes its agents to do, is consistent with the fundamental law, is in opposition to the theory of our institutions.