Pages PREFACE PART I. Introductory address to the Editor of the Candid Examiner, PART II. No. I.-Wherein it is considered, whether salvation implies de- 37 No. II-Exemplary punishment--what was the proper penalty No. III. On the doctrine of Atonement, - 43 49 No. IV-On the conditions of salvation, 54 No V-Arguments and scriptures supposed to support univer- 60 No. VI.-The argument in favor of eternal punishment founded 66 No. VII.-The argument founded upon the strength of the 76 No. VIIL-The argument from the strength of the terms resumed, 84 95 No. X.-The argument deduced from the limitation of the day 106 ERRATA. In page 1, Motto, for ST. PAUL, read SOLOMON, and for SOLOMON read ST. PAUL. 5, line 31, for promises read promise. Ib. lines 5 & 21, for Hornby read Horsley. 1b. line 5, for of read and. Ib. line 24, for absurd read obvious. Ib. line 30, for universalianism read universalism. 85, lines 26, 28 & 33, for Erum read Evum. 99, line 17, for imperfect read pluperfect. 101, line 18, for Volley read Valley. 122, line 5, after the word good read sense. The following errors have occurred in the course of this work: Jocephus for Josephus, Tertulean for Tertullian, Theopholact for Theophylact, Tartaruss for Tartarus, Go morrow for Gomorrah, Origin for Origen, and Irentus for Iræneus. There are still errors in the spelling of some words which are not corrected in this errata |