Fabricating Israeli history: the "new historians"
Frank Cass, 1997 - 210 עמודים
Israeli historiography has long been subjected to a sustained assault by self-styled 'new historians', vying to expose what they claim to be the distorted Zionist narrative of Israeli history and the Arab-Israeli conflict. They have cast Israel as the regional villain, bearing sole responsibility for the cycle of violence in the Middle East since 1946.
Fabricating Israeli History takes issue with these 'revisionists'. Through careful examination of the documentation that they have used, as well as of sources that the author believes they have either ignored or failed to trace, this book propounds that the historical facts tell a completely different story from the one they propagate. He suggests that, for the most part, the 'new historiography' has involved foul play. Numerous examples are studies in depth to illustrate the author's argument.
This is a thoroughly researched and detailed expose that will shock genuine students of history, politics and Middle Eastern affairs.
תוצאות 1-3 מתוך 10
But the distance from this position to approval of Abdullah's annexation of this
territory to his kingdom is very great indeed. In other words it was the Jewish
representative at the meeting who defended Palestinian political rights, by
insisting on ...
TRANSJORDANIAN ANNEXATION OR AN INDEPENDENT PALESTINIAN
STATE? Indeed the Zionists' unquestioned preference of Abdullah over the Mufti
as their direct neighbour did not ipso facto preclude the possibility of an
We will not be able to agree lightly to the annexation of [the Arab] parts of
Palestine to Transjordan, because of 1) Israel's security: an Arab State in Western
Palestine is less dangerous than a state that is tied to Transjordan, and tomorrow