Fabricating Israeli history: the "new historians"
Frank Cass, 1997 - 210 עמודים
Israeli historiography has long been subjected to a sustained assault by self-styled 'new historians', vying to expose what they claim to be the distorted Zionist narrative of Israeli history and the Arab-Israeli conflict. They have cast Israel as the regional villain, bearing sole responsibility for the cycle of violence in the Middle East since 1946.
Fabricating Israeli History takes issue with these 'revisionists'. Through careful examination of the documentation that they have used, as well as of sources that the author believes they have either ignored or failed to trace, this book propounds that the historical facts tell a completely different story from the one they propagate. He suggests that, for the most part, the 'new historiography' has involved foul play. Numerous examples are studies in depth to illustrate the author's argument.
This is a thoroughly researched and detailed expose that will shock genuine students of history, politics and Middle Eastern affairs.
תוצאות 1-3 מתוך 24
of the prospective Jewish State as set by the United Nations.39 So were his
advisers. 'Whatever method is adopted by the Arabs [to abort the UN Partition
Resolution], it is likely to result in a form of partition less favourable to the Jews
than that ...
But leaving aside the conspiratorial theories by both 'new' and 'old' historians, a
serious examination of the newly released official British documents would easily
reveal that: a) Bevin and his advisers would rather not have seen an ...
Eighth, Bevin and his advisers could not care less whether or not Abdullah
transgressed Jewish territory, provided this did not implicate Britain in an
embarrassing international situation. Indeed, shortly after the Bevin-Abul Huda