Fabricating Israeli history: the "new historians"
Frank Cass, 1997 - 210 עמודים
Israeli historiography has long been subjected to a sustained assault by self-styled 'new historians', vying to expose what they claim to be the distorted Zionist narrative of Israeli history and the Arab-Israeli conflict. They have cast Israel as the regional villain, bearing sole responsibility for the cycle of violence in the Middle East since 1946.
Fabricating Israeli History takes issue with these 'revisionists'. Through careful examination of the documentation that they have used, as well as of sources that the author believes they have either ignored or failed to trace, this book propounds that the historical facts tell a completely different story from the one they propagate. He suggests that, for the most part, the 'new historiography' has involved foul play. Numerous examples are studies in depth to illustrate the author's argument.
This is a thoroughly researched and detailed expose that will shock genuine students of history, politics and Middle Eastern affairs.
תוצאות 1-3 מתוך 34
Had transfer not been included in the Peel commission report, it would not have
been placed on the political agenda of the Zionist movement, even though the
idea itself had been mentioned occasionally in the past.' While Morris mentions
Since the late 1930s the Zionist movement had been gradually reconciling itself
to the impossibility of materializing the Zionist dream in its full scope and the
consequent inevitability of dividing the Land of Israel between Arabs and Jews.
This state of affairs was fully applicable to the Zionist movement. The lion's share
of its covert contacts with King Abdullah, among other Arab leaders, was
maintained by the Jewish Agency's Political Department, headed since 1933 by