Fabricating Israeli history: the "new historians"
Frank Cass, 1997 - 210 עמודים
Israeli historiography has long been subjected to a sustained assault by self-styled 'new historians', vying to expose what they claim to be the distorted Zionist narrative of Israeli history and the Arab-Israeli conflict. They have cast Israel as the regional villain, bearing sole responsibility for the cycle of violence in the Middle East since 1946.
Fabricating Israeli History takes issue with these 'revisionists'. Through careful examination of the documentation that they have used, as well as of sources that the author believes they have either ignored or failed to trace, this book propounds that the historical facts tell a completely different story from the one they propagate. He suggests that, for the most part, the 'new historiography' has involved foul play. Numerous examples are studies in depth to illustrate the author's argument.
This is a thoroughly researched and detailed expose that will shock genuine students of history, politics and Middle Eastern affairs.
תוצאות 1-3 מתוך 37
Contrary to Shlaim's claim, Abdullah was not prepared to 'commit himself in
writing' to the division of Mandatory Palestine between himself and the Jews.29
As shown by Shlaim's own text above, Abdullah was not asked by his Jewish ...
that would establish Abdullah's supremacy in the Arab parts of Mandatory
Palestine, both in the eyes of its Palestinian population and the world at large,
and would legitimize his claim to rule this area. But the distance from this position
The Jewish Agency's distrust of Abdullah was vividly demonstrated by its
vehement opposition to the presence of Transjordan's British-led Arab Legion in
Mandatory Palestine and its tireless efforts to bring about its departure.37 Thus, ...