Fabricating Israeli history: the "new historians"
Frank Cass, 1997 - 210 עמודים
Israeli historiography has long been subjected to a sustained assault by self-styled 'new historians', vying to expose what they claim to be the distorted Zionist narrative of Israeli history and the Arab-Israeli conflict. They have cast Israel as the regional villain, bearing sole responsibility for the cycle of violence in the Middle East since 1946.
Fabricating Israeli History takes issue with these 'revisionists'. Through careful examination of the documentation that they have used, as well as of sources that the author believes they have either ignored or failed to trace, this book propounds that the historical facts tell a completely different story from the one they propagate. He suggests that, for the most part, the 'new historiography' has involved foul play. Numerous examples are studies in depth to illustrate the author's argument.
This is a thoroughly researched and detailed expose that will shock genuine students of history, politics and Middle Eastern affairs.
תוצאות 1-3 מתוך 18
All that Ben-Gurion suggested was that the 14 Protocol of the meeting of the
Jewish Agency Executive of 7 June 1938, pp. 11-12 ... Institute for Palestine
Studies, 1992), goes much further in falsifying the proceedings of the same JAE
... two distinct issues contradicted the commitment of the Jewish State-to-be to
complete non-discrimination on grounds of ethnicity, religion, sex, or class: not
that they were linked in any way, shape or form.23 The agenda of the JAE
meeting of ...
All evidence points to the fact that the Mufti has gained control over the Arab
community in the country [Mandatory Palestine]', he told a JAE meeting. 'King
Abdullah is isolated'.40 In a cable to Sharett in New York he was equally puzzled