Fabricating Israeli history: the "new historians"
Frank Cass, 1997 - 210 עמודים
Israeli historiography has long been subjected to a sustained assault by self-styled 'new historians', vying to expose what they claim to be the distorted Zionist narrative of Israeli history and the Arab-Israeli conflict. They have cast Israel as the regional villain, bearing sole responsibility for the cycle of violence in the Middle East since 1946.
Fabricating Israeli History takes issue with these 'revisionists'. Through careful examination of the documentation that they have used, as well as of sources that the author believes they have either ignored or failed to trace, this book propounds that the historical facts tell a completely different story from the one they propagate. He suggests that, for the most part, the 'new historiography' has involved foul play. Numerous examples are studies in depth to illustrate the author's argument.
This is a thoroughly researched and detailed expose that will shock genuine students of history, politics and Middle Eastern affairs.
תוצאות 1-3 מתוך 22
So far as we can see at present [Bevin continued], it should be possible to satisfy
(a) & (b) above, if King Abdullah occupied certain Arab areas of Palestine and
refrained from sending the Arab Legion into the areas allotted to the Jewish State
On 7 February 1948, just after his conversation with Abul Huda, Bevin spoke to
his advisers on the possible entry of Transjordanian forces into the Arab areas of
Palestine, following which B.A.B. Burrows, Head of the Eastern Department, ...
As far as I am aware the intentions of the Trans- jordanian authorities with regard
to the Arab area adjacent to Palestine after 15th May are unchanged but plans for
their execution are still somewhat fluid', he cabled London on 13 April: ...