War and MoralityRichard A. Wasserstrom Wadsworth, 1970 - 136 עמודים |
מתוך הספר
תוצאות 1-3 מתוך 17
עמוד 3
... relevant criteria for deciding whether a particular law is just or unjust , or moral or immoral , and to determine ... relevant criteria ( if there are any ) for deciding whether all legal systems are and must be unjust or immoral ...
... relevant criteria for deciding whether a particular law is just or unjust , or moral or immoral , and to determine ... relevant criteria ( if there are any ) for deciding whether all legal systems are and must be unjust or immoral ...
עמוד 82
... relevant criteria of assessment are prudential or strategic ones . Again , my answer would be that this also constitutes a perfectly defensible and relevant reason for making a moral judgment about the desirability of war as a social ...
... relevant criteria of assessment are prudential or strategic ones . Again , my answer would be that this also constitutes a perfectly defensible and relevant reason for making a moral judgment about the desirability of war as a social ...
עמוד 87
... relevant to the justice of punishing or blaming someone , so in the case of war , what has already happened is , on this view , relevant to the justice or rightness of the war that is subsequently waged . The two backward - looking ...
... relevant to the justice of punishing or blaming someone , so in the case of war , what has already happened is , on this view , relevant to the justice or rightness of the war that is subsequently waged . The two backward - looking ...
תוכן
Introduction | 1 |
The Morality of Obliteration Bombing John C Ford S J | 15 |
War and Murder Elizabeth Anscombe | 42 |
זכויות יוצרים | |
6 קטעים אחרים שאינם מוצגים
מהדורות אחרות - הצג הכל
מונחים וביטויים נפוצים
action aggression American argue argument army Article atomic attack authority behavior believe British brutality Catholic Charter Christian civil population civilian population claim command commit condemned conscience crimes against humanity criminal death of innocent defend destruction distinction doctrine of self-defense double effect duty Elizabeth Anscombe enemy Ethics example fact fighting Germany guerrillas Hague Convention immoral individual innocent persons intention international law jus in bello justified killing Land Warfare large number law of war least limits means meet violence merely military necessity modern murder nations Nazi non-combatants nuclear warfare nuclear weapons Nuremberg Nuremberg trials obliteration bombing one's pacifism pacifist peace philosophical plea of superior political position possible present prisoners problem punishment question rational persuasion reason relevant responsibility rules soldiers Spaight superior orders suppose target thing total war treaty Tribunal violation violence with force waging war crimes war of aggression wars wrong