War and MoralityRichard A. Wasserstrom Wadsworth, 1970 - 136 עמודים |
מתוך הספר
תוצאות 1-3 מתוך 25
עמוד 28
... possible to employ this procedure without directly intending the damage to innocent civilians and their property ? Obviously , the destruction of property is directly intended . The leaders acknowl- edge it as an objective . And on this ...
... possible to employ this procedure without directly intending the damage to innocent civilians and their property ? Obviously , the destruction of property is directly intended . The leaders acknowl- edge it as an objective . And on this ...
עמוד 55
... possible apportionments , and it is extremely unlikely that equality will ever be attained . In every war , the likelihood is that one side is more brutal than the other , though often the differences are too small to matter much , even ...
... possible apportionments , and it is extremely unlikely that equality will ever be attained . In every war , the likelihood is that one side is more brutal than the other , though often the differences are too small to matter much , even ...
עמוד 60
... possible conditions and need to be discussed . The view is common enough that the side fighting a just war has greater latitude in choosing means than does the side fighting an unjust war . After all , war is not a game ; crucial issues ...
... possible conditions and need to be discussed . The view is common enough that the side fighting a just war has greater latitude in choosing means than does the side fighting an unjust war . After all , war is not a game ; crucial issues ...
תוכן
Introduction | 1 |
The Morality of Obliteration Bombing John C Ford S J | 15 |
War and Murder Elizabeth Anscombe | 42 |
זכויות יוצרים | |
6 קטעים אחרים שאינם מוצגים
מהדורות אחרות - הצג הכל
מונחים וביטויים נפוצים
action aggression American argue argument army Article atomic attack authority behavior believe British brutality Catholic Charter Christian civil population civilian population claim command commit condemned conscience crimes against humanity criminal death of innocent defend destruction distinction doctrine of self-defense double effect duty Elizabeth Anscombe enemy Ethics example fact fighting Germany guerrillas Hague Convention immoral individual innocent persons intention international law jus in bello justified killing Land Warfare large number law of war least limits means meet violence merely military necessity modern murder nations Nazi non-combatants nuclear warfare nuclear weapons Nuremberg Nuremberg trials obliteration bombing one's pacifism pacifist peace philosophical plea of superior political position possible present prisoners problem punishment question rational persuasion reason relevant responsibility rules soldiers Spaight superior orders suppose target thing total war treaty Tribunal violation violence with force waging war crimes war of aggression wars wrong