« הקודםהמשך »
a well-ordered train of words and actions. And they speak consistently with themselves; for if the inside be not full of wickedness, if this be clean already, what remains, but to “cleanse the outside of the cup ? ” Outward rcformation, if their supposition be just, is indeed the one thing needful.
5. But ye have not so learned the Oracles of God. Ye know, that He who seeth what is in man gives a far different account both of nature and grace, of our fall and our recovery. know that the great end of Religion is, to renew our hearts in the image of God, to repair that total loss of righteousness and true holiness, which we sustained by the sin of our first parents. Ye know that all religion which does not answer this end, al} that stops short of this, the renewal of our soul in the image of God, alder the likeness of Him that created it, is no other than a poor farce, and a mere mockery of God, to the destruction of ourown soul. ( beware of all those teachers of lies, who would palm this upon you for Christianity! Regard them not, although they should come unto you with all the deceivableness of unrighteousness; with all smoothness of language, all decency, yca, beauty and elegance of expression, all professions of carnest good will to you, and reverence for the Holy Scriptures. Keep to the plain, old faith, “once delivered to the saints," and delivered by the Spirit of God to our hearts. Know your discase! Know your cure! Ye were born in sin: therefore “ye must be born again,” born of God. By nature ye are wholly corrupte? : by grace ye shall be wholly renewed. In Adam ye all died: in the second Adam, in Christ, ye all are made alive. “You that were dead in sins bath he quickened:” he hath already given you a principle of life, even faith in him who loved yon, and gave himself for you! Now, "go on from faith to faith," until your whole sickness be healed, and all that “inind be in you, which was also in Christ Jesus !
1. \p any doctrines within the whole compass of Christianity may be properly termed Fundamental, they are doubtless these two; the doctrine of Justification, and that of the New Birth : the former relating to that great work which God does for us, in forgiving our sins; the latter, to the great work which God does in us, in renewing our fallen nature. In order of time, neither of these is before the other; in the moment we are justified by the grace of God, through the redemption that is in Jesus, we are also “born of the Spirit;” but in order of thinking, as it is termed, Justification precedes the New Birth. We first conceive his wrath to be turned away, and then bis Spirit to work in our hearts.
2. How great importance then must it be of, to every child of man, thoroughly to understand these fundamental doctrines ? From a full conviction of this, many excellent men have wrote very largely concerning Justification, explaining every point relating thereto, and opening the Scriptures which treat uponi it. Many likewise have wrote on the New Birth : and some of them largely enough: but yet not so clearly as might hare been desired; nor so deeply and accurately; having either given a dark, abstruse account of it, or a slight and superficial one. Therefore a full, and at the same time a clear account of the New Birth, seems to be wanting still; such as may enable us to give a satisfactory answer to these three questions: First, Why must we be born again? What is the foundation of this doctrine of the New Birth? Secondly, How must we be born again? What is the nature of the New Birth ? And, Thirdly, Wherefore must we be born again? To what end is it necessary ? These questions, by the assistance of God, I shall briefly and plainly answer, and then subjoin a few Inferences which will naturally follow.
1. ). And first, Wiy must we be born again? What is the Foundation of this doctrine ? The foundation of it lies near as decp as the creation of the world; in the scriptural account whereof we read, “ And God," the Three-One God, said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness. So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him :" (Gen. i. 26, 27 :)-not barcly in his natural image, a picture of his own in.mortality; a spiritual being, endued with understanding, freedom of will, and various affections ;nor merely in his political image, the governor of this lower world, having "dominion over the fishes of the sca, and over all the earth;”—but cbicfly in his morul image; which, according to the Apostle, is “righteousness and true holiness." (Eph. iv. 21.) In this image of God was man made. “God
love:” accordingly man at bis creation was full of love; which was the sole principle of all his tempers, thoughts, words, and actions. God is full of justice, mercy, and truth; so was man as he came from the hands of his Creator. God is spotless purity; and so man was in the beginning pure from every sinful blot; otherwise God could not have pronounced him, as well as all the other works of his hands, “very good.”' (Gen. i. 31.) This he could not have been, had he not been pure from sin, and filled with righteousness and true holiness. For there is no medium : if we suppose an intelligent creature not to love God, not to be righteous and holy, we necessarily suppose him not to be good at all; much less to be “ very goud."
2. Büt, although man was made in the image of God, yet he was not made immutable. This would have been inconsistent with that state of trial in which God was pleased to place him. He was therefore created able to stand, and yet liable to fall. And this God himself apprized him of, and gave him a solemn warning against it. Nevertheless, man did not abide in honour: hic fell from his high estate. He “ate of the tree whereof the Lord had commanded him, Thou shalt not eat thereof.” By this wilful act of disobedience to his Creator, this flat rebellion against his Sorereign, he openly declared that he would no longer bare God to rule over him; that he would be governed by his own will, and not the will of him that created him; and that he would not scck his happiness in God, but in the world, in the works of his hands. Now God had told him before, “In the day that thou eatest [of that fruit] thou shalt surely dic." And the word of the Lord cannot be
broken. Accordingly, in that day he did die: he died to God, the most dreadful of all deaths. He lost the life of God: he was separated from Him, in union with whom his spiritual life consisted. The body dies when it is separated from the soul; the soul, when it is separated from God. But this separation from God, Adam sustained in the day, the hour, he ate of the forbidden fruit. And of this he gave immediate proof; presently showing by his behaviour, that the love of God was extinguished in his soul, which was now "alienated from the life of God.” Instead of this he was now under the power of servile fear, so that he fled from the presence of the Lord. Yca, so little did he retain even of the knowledge of Him who filleth heaven and earth, that he endeavoured to “bide himself from the Lord God, among the trees of the garden:” (Gen. jii. 8:) so had he lost both the knowledge and the love of God, without which the image of God could not subsist. Of this therefore he was deprived at the same time, and became unholy as well as unhappy. In the room of this, he had sunk into pride and self-will, the very image of the Devil; and into sensual appetites and desires, the image of the beasts that perisk.
3. If it be said, “Nay, but that threatening, “Iu the day that thou eatest thereof, thou shalt surely die,” refers to temporal death and that alone, to the death of the body only;' the answer is plain : To affirm this is flatly and palpably to make God a liar; to aver that the God of truth positively affirmed a thing contrary to truth. For it is evident, Adam did not die in this sense, “in the day that he ate thereof." He lived in the sense opposite to this death, above nine hundred years after. So that this cannot possibly be understood of the death of the body, without impeaching the veracity of God. It must therefore be understood of spiritual death, the loss of the life and image of God.
4. And in Adam all died, all human kind, all the children of men who were then in Adam's loins. The natural consequence of this is, that every one descended from him comes into the world spiritually dead, dead to God, wholly dead in sin; entirely void of the life of God; void of the image of God, of all that righteousness and holiness wherein Adam was created. Instead of this, every man born into the world now bears the image of the Devil, in pride and self-will; the image of the beast, in sensual appetites and desires. This then is the Lundation of the New Birth,-the entire corruption of our Nature. llence it is, that being born in sin, we must be " born again.” Ilence every one that is born of a woman, must be boru of the Spirit of God.
11. 1. But llow must a man be born again? What is the Nature of the New Birth? This is the Second question. And it question it is of the highest moment that can be conceived. We onglit not therefore, in so weighty a concern, to be contcut with a slight inquiry; but to examine it with all possible Care; and to ponder it in unr bearts, till we fully understand this important point, and clearly see how we are to be born again.
?. Not that we are to expect any minute, philosophical account of the manner how this is done. Our Lord sufficicutly guards us against any such expectation, by the words immediately following the text; wherein he reminds Nicodemus of as indisputable a fact as any in the whole compass of pature, which, notwithstanding, the wisest man under the sun is not able fuily to explain. “The wind bloweth where it listeth," --not by thy power or wisdom; "and thou bearest the sound thereof;"—thou art absolutely assured, beyond all doubt, that it cloth blow; “but thou canst not tol whence it cometh, nor whither it goein;"ibe precise manner bow it begins and ends, rises and falls, no mai can tell. “So is clery one that is born of the Spirit :”- thou mayest be as absolutely assured of the fact, as of the blowing of the wind; but the precise manner how it is done, lour the Iloly Spirit works this in the soul, neither thou mor the wisest of the children of men is able to explain. 3. However, it safiices for every rational and christian
, parpose, but without descending into curious, critical inquiries, le can give a plain scriptural account of the nature of the New Birth. This will satisfy every reasonable man, who desire's only the salvation of his soul. The expression, being bom again, us not first used by our Lord in bis conversation with Nicodemus: It was well known before that time, and was in common use among the Jews when our Saviour appeared among them. When an adult Heathen was convinced that the Jewish religion was of God, and desired to join therein, it was the custom to baptize him first, before he was admitted to circumcision. And when he was baptized, he was said to be born again; lsy which they meant, that he who was before a child of the Devil, was now adopted into the family of God, and accounted one of his children. This expression, therefore,