« הקודםהמשך »
“And God save that the wickelness of man was great in the
carth, and that every imagination of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually.” Gen. vi. 5.
1. How widely different is this from the fair pictures of human nature, which men have drawn in all ages! The writings of many of the ancients abound with gay descriptions of the dignity of man; whom some of them paint as having all virtne and happiness in his composition, or at least, entirely in his power, without being beholden to any other being; yea, as self-sufficient; able to live on his own stock, and little inferior to God himself.
2. Nor bare heathens alone, men who were guided in their researches by little more than the dim light of reason, but many likewise of them that bear the name of Christ, and to whom are entrusted the Oracles of God, spoken as magnificently concerning the nature of man, as if it were all innocence and perfection. Accounts of this kind have particularly abounded in the present century; and perhaps in no part of the world more than in our own country. Here not a few persons of strong understanding, as well as extensive learning, have employed their utmost abilities to show, what they termed, " The fair side of human nature." And it must be acknoirlelged, that if their accounts of him be just, man is still but “a Titile lower than the angels; or, as the words
may bilerally rendered, “a little less than God.”
Is it any wonder, that these accounts are very readily received by the generality of men ? For who is not easily persuaded to think favourably of himself? Accordingly, writers of this kind are most universally read, admired, applauded. du innumerable are the converts they have made, not only
in the gay, but the learned world. So that it is now quite unfashionable to talk otherwise, to say any thing to the disparagement of human nature; which is generally allowed, notwithstanding a few infirmities, to be very innocent, and wise, and virtuous !
4. But, in the mean time, what must we do with our Bibles ? -for they will never agree with this. These accounts, however pleasing to flesh and blood, are utterly irreconcilable with the scriptural. The Scripture avers, that “ by one man's disobedience all men were constituted sinners; " that " in Adam all died,” spiritually died, lost the life and the image of God; that fallen, sinful Adam then “begat a sou in his own likeness ;- nor was it possible he should beget him in any other; for “ who can bring a clean thing out of an unclean?"that consequently we, as well as other men, were by nature “dead in trespasses and sins," “ without hope, without God in the world,” and therefore“ children of wrath ;” that every man may say, “I was shapen in wickedness, and in sin did my mother conceive me ;” that “there is no difference," in that “all have sinned and come short of the glory of God," of that glorious image of God, wherein man was originally created. And hence, when “the Lord looked down from heaven upon the children of men, he saw they were all gone out of the way; they were altogether become abominable, there was none righteous, no, not one," none that truly sought after God: Just agrecable this, to what is declared by the Holy Ghost, in the words above recited, “God saw, when he looked down from heaven before, “that the wickedness of man was great in the earth ; " so great, that “every imagination of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually.”
This is God's account of man : from which I shall take occasion, First, To show what men were Before the Flood : Secondly, To inquire, Whether they are not the same Now? Aud, Thirdly, to add some Inferences.
I. 1. I am, First, by opening the words of the text to show, what men were Before the Flood. And we may fully depend on the account here given : for God saw it, and He cannot be deceived. He "saw that the wickedness of man was great :” —Not of this or that man; not of a few men only; not barely of the greater part, but of man in general; of men universally. The word includes the whole human race, every partaker of human nature. And it is not easy for us to compute their
umbers, to tell how many thousands and millions they were. The carth then retained much of its primeval beauty, and original fruitfulness. The face of the globe was not rent and torn, as it is now; and spring and summer went hand in hand. It is therefore probable, it afforded sustenance for far more ivhabitants than it is now capable of sustaining ; and these must be immensely multiplied, while men begat sons and daughters for seven or eight hundred years together. Yet, among all this inconceivable number, only “Noah found favour with God." He alone (perhaps including part of his household) was an exception from the universal wickedness, which, by the just judgment of God, in a short time after brought on universal destruction. All the rest were partakers in the same guilt as they were in the same punishment.
2. “God saw all the imaginations of the thoughts of his heart; "-of his soul, his inward man, the spirit within him, the principle of all his inward and outward motions. He “saw all the imaginations:”-It is not possible to find a word of a more extensive signification. It includes whatever is formed, made, fabricated within ; all that is or passes in the soul; every inclination, aflection, passion, appetite; every temper, design, thought. It must of consequence include every word and action, ils naturally flowing from these fountains, and being either good or evil according to the fountain from which they severally now.
3. Now God saw that all this, the whole thereof, was evil; --- contrary to moral rectitude; contrary to the nature of God, which necessarily includes all good; contrary to the Divine Will, the eternal standard of good and evil; contrary to the pure, holy image of God, wherein man was originally created, and wherein be stood when God, surveying the works of his hands, saw them all to be very good; contrary to justice, merey, and truth, and to the essential relations which cach man bore to his Creator and his fellow-creatures.
1. Dit was there not good mingled with the evil ? Was there not light intermised with the darkness ? No; none at all: “God saw that the whole imagination of the heart of man was only cvil." It cannot indeed be denied, but many of them, perhaps all, bad good motions put into their hearts ; for the Spirit of God did then also “strive with man,” if haply he might repent, more especially during that gracious reprieve, the hundred and twenty years, while the ark was preparing. But still in his nesh dueli ne good thing;” all his nature
was purely evil: It was wholly consistent with itself, and unmixed with any thing of an opposite nature.
5. However, it may still be matter of inquiry, Was there no intermission of this evil? Were there no lucid intervals, wherein something good might be found in the heart of man?' We are not here to consider, what the grace of God might occasionally work in his soul; and, abstracted from this, we have no reason to believe, there was any intermission of that evil. For God, who “saw the whole imagination of the thoughts of his heart to be only evil,” saw likewise, that it was always the same, that it " was only evil continually ; every year, every day, every hour, every moment. He never deviated into good.
II. Such is the authentic account of the whole race of mankind, which He who knoweth what is in man, who searcheth the heart and trieth the reins, bath left upon record for our instruction. Such were all men before God brought the Flood upon the earth. We are, Secondly, to inquire, Whether they are the same Now?
1. And this is certain, the Scripture gives us no reason to think any otherwise of them. On the contrary, all the abovecited passages of Scripture refer to those who lived after the Flood. It was above a thousand years after, that God declared by David concerning the children of men, “They are all gone out of the way, [of truth and holiness,) there is none righteous, no, not one.” And to this bear all the Prophets witness, in their several generations. So Isaiah, concerning God's peculiar people, (and certainly the Heathens were in no better condition,) “The whole head is sick, and the whole heart faint. From the sole of the foot even unto the head there is no soundness in it; but wounds, and bruises, and putrefying sores.” The same account is given by all the Apostles, yea, by the whole tenor of the Oracles of God. From all these we learn, concerning man in his natural state, unassisted by the grace of God, that “every imagination of the thoughts of his heart is (still] evil, only evil (and that] continually.”
2. And this account of the present state of man is confirmed by daily Experience. It is true, the natural man discerns it not: and this is not to be wondered at. So long as a man, born blind, continues so, he is scarce sensible of his want : Much less, could we suppose a place where all were born without sight, would they be sensible of the want of it. In like manner, so long as men remain in their natural blindness of understanding, they are not sensible of their spiritual tants, and of this in particular. But as soon as God opens the eyes of their understanding, they see the state they were in before; they are then deeply convinced, that “every man living," themselves especially, are, by nature, “altogether vanity;” that is, folly and ignorance, sin and wickedness.
3. We sce, when God opens our eyes, that we were before 19:01 EV TEU xohly, without God, or rather, Atheists in the world, We had, by nature, no knowledge of God, no acquaintance with him. It is true, as soon as ic came to the use of reason, we learned “the invisible things of God, even bis eternal power and Godhead, from the things that are made." From the things that are seen we inferred the existence of an eternal, powerful Being, that is not seen. But still, although we acknowledged his being, we had no acquaintance with liim. As we know there is an Emperor of China, whom yet we do not know; so we knew there was a king of all the earth, yet we knew liim pot. Indeed, we could not, by any of our natural faculties. By none of these could we attain the kuowledge of God. We could no more perceive him by our natural understanding, than we could see him with our eyes. For “no one knoweth the Father but the Son, and he to whom the Son willeth to reveal him. And no one knoweth the Son but the Father, and he to whom the Father revealeth him."
4. We read of an ancient king, who, being desirous to know what was the natural language of men, in order to bring the matter to a certain issue, made the following experiment: He ordered two infants, as soon as they were born, to be conveyed to a place prepared for them, where they were brought up without any instruction at all, and without ever hearing a human voice. And what was the event? Why, that when they were at length brought out of their confinement, they spake no language at all, they uttered only inarticulate sounds, like those of other animals. Were two infants in like manner to be brought up from the womb without being instructed in any religion, there is little room to doubt, but (unless the grace of God interposed) the event would be just the same. They would have no religion at all: they would have no knowledge of God than the beasts of the field, than the wild ass's colt. Such is Natural Religion, abstracted from Traditional, and from the influences of God's Spirit !
5. And having no kuowledge, we can have no Love of God: we cannot love Him we know not. Mlost men talk indeed of