Australian Urban Planning: New Challenges, New Agendas
Designed for use by academics, students, planning professionals, and anyone who takes an interest in the development of cities, this timely book explains the changes that have transformed planning in Australia and reinstates the need for planning based on principles that foreground social inclusion and ecological sustainability.
מה אומרים אנשים - כתיבת ביקורת
לא מצאנו ביקורות במקומות הרגילים
Greening planning? Environmental perspectives
Let the market decide From managerialism to neoliberalism
The impacts on planning thought and practice
from policy to action
radical cultural critiques
מהדורות אחרות - הצג הכל
agenda Agenda 21 analysis areas argued Australian cities Australian planning Australian Settlement capital capitalist societies cent centres chapter Commonwealth competition coordination corporate liberalism critical critique of planning cultural pluralisation Darling Harbour democracy diversity ecological sustainability ecologically sustainable development economic emerged employment environment ethnic framework global globalisation green bans groups growth housing increasingly indigenous Australians industry infrastructure institutions Kennett government labour land Long Boom major managerialism Marxist Melbourne ment metropolitan neoliberal organisation planners planning systems pluralist polarisation postmodern postwar privatisation produced professional public interest public planning public sector public service public transport Queensland radical recent reform regional regulation residential role shift social democratic South Australia South Wales spatial strategy suburbs sustainable development Sydney town planning urban consolidation urban governance urban planning urban policy urban political economy values Victoria Western
עמוד 18 - The world is not so governed from above that private and social interest always coincide. It is not so managed here below that in practice they coincide. It is not a correct deduction from the Principles of Economics that enlightened self-interest always operates in the public interest. Nor is it true that self-interest generally is enlightened; more often individuals acting separately to promote their own ends are too ignorant or too weak to attain even these. Experience does not show that individuals,...
עמוד 158 - It defines sustainable development as "development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs
עמוד 18 - It is not true that individuals possess a prescriptive "natural liberty" in their economic activities. There is no "compact" conferring perpetual rights on those who Have or on those who Acquire. The world is not so governed from above that private and social interest always coincide.
עמוד 20 - ... justice rather than absolute equality, with differentiation of rewards and status on the basis of genuine equality rather than privilege; planning not for a classless society but for one that abolishes the extremes of wealth and poverty ; planning for cultural standards without 'levelling...
עמוד 14 - modernity refers to modes of social life or organisation which emerged in Europe from about the seventeenth century onwards and which subsequently became more or less worldwide in their influence.
עמוד 19 - In reality, as far as the mass of mankind are concerned, what commonly remains is, not liberty, but tyranny. In urban communities with dense populations, or in great productive undertakings employing armies of workers, someone must make rules and see that they are kept, or life becomes impossible and the wheels do not turn. If public power does not make them, the effect is not that every individual is free to make them for himself. It is that they are made by private power — by landlords interested...
עמוד 15 - The reflexivity of modern social life consists in the fact that social practices are constantly examined and reformed in the light of incoming information about those very practices, thus constitutively altering their character.
עמוד 19 - First of all, it imposes a number of inheritance and gift taxes, and sets restrictions on the rights of bequest. The purpose of these levies and regulations is not to raise revenue (release resources to government) but gradually and continually to correct the distribution of wealth and to prevent concentrations of power detrimental to the fair value of political liberty and fair equality of opportunity.
כל תוצאות חיפוש הספרים »