תמונות בעמוד
PDF
ePub

Communion of the clergy and laity according to the British church justified, ii. 151. distributed in both kinds by the eastern church, ibid. corruption in the west, 152. place of communion, ibid. communion anthems, 153. forms of delivery, ibid. of the sick, 229. the practice of the church of England in this justified, 229, 230. ancient rubric of the church, for the consolation of those who cannot communicate, 230, 231. Compline, an hour of prayer, its origin, i. 204. Confession, in morning prayer justified by practice of the eastern church, i. 212, 213. its antiquity in the west, 213, 214. in the evening prayer, its antiquity, 252. in the communion service, formerly made in silence, ii. 104. its position and use justified from ancient liturgies, 105. its substance compared with that of some ancient formularies, 106, 107. private in the liturgy, i. 122. Confirmation, when administer

ed in primitive times, ii. 198, 199. different customs of the east and west, ibid. antiquity of chrism, ibid. different modes of laying on hands, 200, 201. English office of confirmation, 202, &c. invocation of the Holy Spirit, 203. imposition of hands, 204. conclusion of the office, 205-207. Consecration, in the English liturgy objected to by Romanists, and proved to be valid, ii. 9, &c. prayer of, in the English liturgy how

divided, 134. its form in different churches varied, 135. eastern and Roman forms, ibid. invocation of the Holy Ghost how prevalent, 136. proved not to be essential, from practice of Roman and Italian churches, ibid. for other reasons, 138. English prayer of consecration examined and proved to be perfectly valid, 139, 140. such a prayer necessary, 141. in the Gallican liturgy, considerations as to its form, i. 163, &c. Constantinople, liturgy of, see CHRYSOSTOM.

Constantinopolitan Creed, its origin, ii. 53. when first used in the liturgy, 54. its position, 55. its original text, 56, 57.

Cope, what it was originally, ii. 312. its shape and materials, 313. when prescribed by the English ritual, ibid. worn instead of the chasible in the east, 314. Coptic liturgies, i. 82. at what seasons used, 83. language, anciently used in divine service, 83, 84.

Creed, Constantinopolitan, used in the ancient Spanish liturgy, i. 175. Cross, sign of the, how anciently used by Christians, ii. 190. CYRIL ALEXANDRINUS, liturgy of, in Coptic, used by monophysites of Alexandria, i. 82, 83. probably written in Greek at first, 83. divine service performed in Coptic from the earliest ages, 83, 84. this liturgy represents the original Alexandrian rite, 85. proved from St. Mark's

liturgy, 85, 86. proved from the Ethiopic liturgy, 89. the Ethiopic liturgy enables us to trace the order of Cyril's liturgy to the time of Åthanasius, 90, 91. differences between Cyril's and Mark's liturgies accounted for, 92, &c. comparison between Cyril's, Mark's, and the Ethiopic liturgy, establishing the primitive Alexandrian order, 97-99. further comparison with the writings of Egyptian fathers, 100-103. See St. MARK.

Dalmatic, see Tunicle. Deacons, their office in the liturgy during the primitive ages, ii. 104. ordinations of, in the English ritual, 300, 306.

Dead, prayers for the, in the liturgy very ancient, ii. 94. British church justified for removing them from her public offices, 95-97. Decalogue, see Law. Decentius of Eugubium, letter to him from Innocentius, i. 118.

Diocese, civil, explained, i. 6, 7.

how governed, 7. how many in the Roman empire, ibid. Diptychs in the Gallican liturgy, i. 160.

Discipline, secret, what it was,

i. 14. its influence on the language of the fathers, ibid. Dissenters, their objection to the English ritual, as derived from the Roman, met, ii. 1, &c.

Egypt, ancient customs of

psalmody there, i. 243. orthodox of, their liturgy of St. Mark altered to suit the Constantinopolitan rite, why,

193.

Egyptian liturgy, peculiarities

of it, i. 98, 99. See MARK. CYRIL. Elements for the eucharist, when placed on the holy table, ii. 74. custom of the eastern church, ibid. water mixed with the wine not essential, 75, 76. bread how to be prepared, 77.

Elevation of the eucharist not practised by the English church, ii. 16. ENGLAND, liturgy of, after the time of Augustine, i. 185, 186. origin of the "uses' of York, Sarum, &c., 186. remarks on the ritual books of York and Hereford, ibid. Sarum, use, whence derived, ibid. extensive prevalence of this rite, 187. origin of a title of the bishop of Sarum, ibid. Lincoln and Bangor uses, ibid. Aberdeen in Scotland, its rites, 188. various monastic rites noticed, ibid. missal of Evesham, ibid. of Oxford, ibid. all these rites differed but little, ibid. English ritual as now used, 188, 189. ritual of, is invested with canonical and spiritual authority, ii. 3-8. calumnies against it, 9. EPHESUS, exarchate of, its extent, i. 106. when it became subject to the patriarch of Constantinople, ibid. its liturgies, ibid. conjectures as to the cause of the nineteenth canon of the council of Laodicea, ibid. this canon seems to appoint an order similar to that now used, 107, 108. reasons for thinking the Gallican liturgy formerly prevailed in this exarchate, 108-110. Dif

ferences between the great oriental and the Gallican liturgies, 109. Epistle in the English liturgy, ii. 42. where anciently read, 43. corner where it was read how entitled, ibid. Epistles, used in the English li

turgy, their antiquity, i. 314, &c. traced in the ancient Lectionaries, 317, &c. Epistoler, what, ii. 44. Espousals, what, ii. 211. ETHIOPIA, when converted to Christianity, i. 89. liturgy of, originally derived from that of Alexandria, ibid. where found, ibid. was an independent liturgy from the beginning, 89, 90. what it omits, 90. its use in tracing the ancientAlexandrian rites, 91. comparison with Mark's and Cyril's liturgy establishing primitive Alexandrian rite, 100-103. See MARK, CYRIL.

Eucharist, why the liturgy and

the sacred elements were called so by the fathers, ii. 113. the liturgy called so by St. Paul, 114, &c. Eulogia, or blessed bread, what,

ii. 154. Evening prayers of the British

church, or evensong, whence derived, i. 206, 253. See Vespers.

Evesham, missal belonging to the monastery there, i. 188. Exarch, meaning of the term, i. 6.

Exhortation, in the morning

and evening prayers justified, i. 211, 252. in the communion service defended, ii. 99, 100.

Expulsion of bishops by queen Elizabeth justified, ii. 279.

the church has always directed bishops to be ordained to sees vacant de facto by the acts of kings, 280, 281. reasons for expelling queen Mary's bishops, 281 -285. Festivalis liber, what, ii. 65. Forum Julii, liturgy used there, i. 132.

Frumentius, converted the Ethiopians, i. 89. was ordained bishop by Athanasius, ibid.

GAUL, liturgy of, by whom elucidated, i. 143, 158. who were the authors of the Gallican missal, 143, 144. the liturgy was different from the Roman, 144. was exchanged for it by means of Pepin and Charlemagne, 145. was more ancient than the time of Hilary of Poitiers, 146-148. and originally derived from the church of Lyons, 148, &c. Lyons the oldest church in Gaul, 149, 150. sent missionaries through a large part of Gaul, 151. the Roman missionaries in the third century must have adopted the liturgy of Lyons, 152, 153. this liturgy derived from the churches of Asia and the tradition of St. John the apostle, 153, 154. testimony of the British and Irish churches to this effect, 155 -157. argument for the apostolical antiquity of this liturgy, 157. its order and substance stated, 158, &c. what liturgy it chiefly resembled, 163. difficulty with regard to the form of consecration, ibid. invocation of the Holy Ghost originally

used in it, 164, 165. no reason to think that it was introduced into Britain by Germanus and Lupus, 176. probably was used in Britain and Ireland from the earliest period, 179, 180. Gelasius, patriarch of Rome, his sacramentary, i. 116. when first printed, ibid. Gloria in excelsis sung after communion by the English church, antiquity of the custom, ii. 158. and of the hymn, ibid. its original text, 159, 160.

Gloria Patri at the beginning of morning prayer, its origin, i. 219, 220. Gospel, by whom read, ii. 50. ceremonies in reading it, 51, 52. whence read, 52. Gospeller, what, ii. 52. Gospels, read in the English liturgy, their antiquity, i. 314, &c. traced in the ancient Lectionaries, 317, &c. Graduale, what it was, i. 308.

ii. 46. its antiquity, 46, 47. Greece, under what ecclesiasti

cal jurisdiction it is, i. 73. Gregory the Great, his alterations of the Roman liturgy, i. 112. suggestions for ascertaining the text of his sacramentary, 123. Gregory Nazianzen, Coptic liturgy bearing his name, i. 83. when used, ibid. probably written in Greek originally, ibid. actually extant in Greek, ibid. alluded to by an Irish author in the seventh century, 88. Gregory VII. of Rome, his de

cree about the offices null and void in these countries,

i. 224. Hales of Eton, his objections

against the text of Chrysostom's liturgy, i. 75, 77. Hereford "use," how it arose, 186. books containing it, ibid.

Hood, its origin and antiquity, ii. 320.

Homilarium, what, i. 208. Hours of prayer, called canonical hours, i. 201. how many were customary in England formerly, ibid. origin of nocturns, 202. lauds, 203. prime, ibid. third, sixth, and ninth hours, 204. vespers, ibid. compline, ibid. the church of England justified for appointing two hours of prayer, 205. services performed at the hours of prayer, 205, 206. British offices of morning and evening prayer, whence derived, 206. books used at the canonical hours, 206, 207. canonical hours of the eastern churches, &c. 208. Hymnarium, what, i. 207. INDIA, Christianity early esta

blished there, i. 196. liturgy of Malabar as used by the Nestorians of St. Thomas, 197. liturgies now used in India by the Christians of St. Thomas, ibid. Innocentius, bishop of Rome, his testimony to the order and antiquity of the Roman liturgy, i. 118.

Institution, words of, necessary to a valid consecration of the sacrament, ii. 141. various forms from the ancient liturgies, 142-144.repeated aloud by us according to primitive custom, 147. Intention, doctrine of, affords no legitimate objection against the consecration in the

church of England, i. 10,
&c.
Introduction of the liturgy, i. 20,

30, 31, 38, 48, 59, 60, 64.
Introductions of several litur-
gies before the lessons de-
scribed, ii. 21, 22.
Introits mentioned by eastern
and western authors, ii. 19,

20.

Invitatory anthem, and psalm,
what, i. 222.

Invocation of the Holy Ghost,

not deficient in the English
liturgy, ii. 10, 139.
Invocations of saints, not used

in the eastern litanies, i. 276,
277. their antiquity in the
west, 277, 278. not origin-
ally used, 278, 279. litanies
in which they do not occur,
279-281. probably used in-
stead of Kyrie eleison, 282.
the church justified for re-
moving them, 289–292.
IRELAND, liturgy of, probably

the same as the British ori-
ginally, i. 180, 181. monu-
ment of the Irish liturgy
discovered by Dr. O'Conor,
181. date of the MS. ibid.
how proved to have belonged
to the Irish church, by in-
ternal and external evidence,
182, 183. its order and sub-
stance described, 183, 184.
resembled the ancient Ro-
man, 185.

church of, sent mis-
sionaries to England, who
converted the greater part
of the Saxons, ii. 250. was
independent of the Roman
patriarch, according to the
most learned Romanists,
260, 263. origin of the Rom-
ish sect in that country, 251.
Jacobites, or monophysites,
what, i. 15.

JAMES, St. liturgy of. In Sy-
riac, anciently used by the
monophysites of Syria, i. 16.
its appellation older than
council of Chalcedon, 19. its
text ascertained, 20, 21.com-
pared with Greek liturgy of
St. James, 27, 28. deduction
from this comparison, 28.
In Greek, anciently used by
orthodox of Syria and Jeru-
salem, 17, 18. its text as-
certained by MSS. 21, 22.
controversy about it, 22. ar-
guments to prove that it was
interpolated from Constan-
tinopolitan liturgies, and
some other source before the
tenth century, 23—26. view
which we are to take of St.
James's Greek liturgy as now
extant, 26. as used before
council of Chalcedon, A.D.
451. ascertained by compa-
rison of Greek and Syriac
liturgies, 27, 28. quoted by
Theodoret, 29. by Jerome,
30. Chrysostom's account of
the introduction of this li-
turgy, 30, 31. his references
to the anaphora, 31-33.
allusions of Ephrem Syrus,
33. Cyril of Jerusalem, 35.
the Apostolical Constitu-
tions, 37-40. Justin Mar-
tyr, 41. antiquity of St.
James's liturgy, 42. origin
and date of its title, 43, 44.
Jerusalem, liturgy of, see St.

JAMES, patriarchate of, its
antiquity and extent, i. 15.
John, St. evangelist, probably
originated the liturgy of
Ephesus and of Gaul, i. 154,
&c.
Jubilate Deo, in morningprayer,
its antiquity, i. 233.
Kells, synod of, in Ireland, i.
184, 185. ii. 263.

« הקודםהמשך »