תמונות בעמוד
PDF
ePub

SERMON XXXIV.

Hail, thou that art highly favoured: The Lord is with thee: Blessed art thou among women.-LUKE i. 28.*

[ocr errors]

THAT she who in these terms was saluted by an angel should in after ages become an object of superstitious adoration, is a thing far less to be wondered, than that men professing to build their whole hopes of immortality on the promises delivered in the sacred books, and closely interwoven with the history of our Saviour's life, should question the truth of the message which the angel brought. Some nine years since, the Christian church was no less astonished than offended, by an extravagant attempt to heighten, as it was pretended, the importance of the Christian revelation, by overturning one of those first principles of natural religion which had for ages been considered as the basis upon which the whole superstructure of revelation stands. The notion of an immaterial principle in man, which, without an immediate exertion of the Divine power to the express purpose of its destruction, must necessarily survive the dissolution of the body-the notion of an immortal soul-was condemned and exploded as an invention of heathen philosophy: Death was represented as an utter extinction of the whole man; and the evangelical doctrine of a resurrection of the body in an improved state, to receive again its immortal inhabitant, was heightened into the mystery of a reproduction of the annihilated person. How a person once annihilated could be reproduced, so as to be the same person which had formerly existed, when no principle of sameness, nothing necessarily permanent, was supposed to enter the original composition,-how the present person could be

* Preached on Christmas-day.

interested in the future person's fortunes,-why I should be at all concerned for the happiness or misery of the man who some ages hence shall be raised from my ashes, when the future man could be no otherwise the same with me than as he was arbitrarily to be called the same, because his body was to be composed of the same matter which now composes mine,-these difficulties were but ill explained. It was thought a sufficient recommendation of the system, with all its difficulties, that the promise of a resurrection of the body seemed to acquire a new importance from it (but the truth is, that it would lose its whole importance if this system could be established; since it would become a mere prediction concerning a future race of men, and would be no promise to any men now existing); and the notion of the soul's natural immortality was deemed an unseemly appendage of a Christian's belief,-for this singular reason, that it had been entertained by wise and virtuous heathens, who had received no light from the Christian, nor, as it was supposed, from any earlier revelation.

It might have been expected, that this anxiety to extinguish every ray of hope which beams not from the glorious promises of the gospel, would have been accompanied with the most entire submission of the understanding to the letter of the written word-the most anxious solicitude for the credit of the sacred writers-the warmest zeal to maintain every circumstance in the history of our Saviour's life which might add authority to his precepts and weight to his promises, by heightening the dignity of his person : but so inconsistent with itself is human folly, that they who at one time seemed to think it a preliminary to be required of every one who would come to a right belief of the gospel, that he should unlearn and unbelieve what philosophy had been thought to have in common with the gospel (as if reason and revelation could in nothing agree), upon other occasions discover an aversion to the belief of any thing which at all puts our reason to a stand: and

in order to wage war with mystery with the more advantage, they scruple not to deny, that that Spirit which enlightened the first preachers in the delivery of their oral instruction, and rendered them infallible teachers of the age in which they lived, directed them in the composition of those writings which they left for the edification of succeeding ages. They pretend to have made discoveries of inconclusive reasoning in the epistles-of doubtful facts in the gospels; and appealing from the testimony of the apostles to their own judgments, they have not scrupled to declare their opinion, that the miraculous conception of our Lord is a subject "with respect to which any person is at full liberty to think as the evidence shall appear to him, without any impeachment of his faith or character as a Christian:" and lest a simple avowal of this extraordinary opinion should not be sufficiently offensive, it is accompanied with certain obscure insinuations, the reserved meaning of which we are little anxious to divine, which seem intended to prepare the world not to be surprised if something still more extravagant (if more extravagant may be) should in a little time be declared.

We are assembled this day to commemorate our Lord's nativity. It is not as the birth-day of a prophet that this day is sanctified; but as the anniversary of that great event which had been announced by the whole succession of prophets from the beginning of the world, and in which the predictions concerning the manner of the Messiah's advent received their complete and literal accomplishIn the predictions, as well as in the corresponding event, the circumstance of the miraculous conception makes so principal a part, that we shall not easily find subjects of meditation more suited either to the season or to the times than these two points,-the importance of this doctrine as an article of the Christian faith; and the sufficiency of the evidence by which the fact is supported.

ment.

First, for the importance of the doctrine as an article of the faith. It is evidently the foundation of the whole

distinction between the character of Christ in the condition of a man and that of any other prophet. Had the conception of Jesus been in the natural way-had he been the fruit of Mary's marriage with her husband-his intercourse with the Deity could have been of no other kind than the nature of any other man might have equally admitted, an intercourse of no higher kind than the prophets enjoyed, when their minds were enlightened by the extraordinary influence of the Holy Spirit. The information conveyed to Jesus might have been clearer and more extensive than any imparted to any former prophet; but the manner and the means of communication must have been the same. The holy Scriptures speak a very different language: they tell us, that "the same God who spake in times past to the fathers by the prophets, hath in these latter days spoken unto us by his Son;" evidently establishing a distinction of Christianity from preceding revelations, upon a distinction between the two characters of a prophet of God, and of God's Son. Moses, the great lawgiver of the Jews, is described in the book of Deuteronomy as superior to all succeeding prophets, for the intimacy of his intercourse with God, for the variety of his miracles, and for the authority with which he was invested. "There arose not a prophet in Israel like unto Moses, whom Jehovah knew face to face,-in all the signs and wonders which Jehovah sent him to do in the land of Egypt, to Pharoah, and all his servants, and to all his land,---and in all that mighty hand, and in all the great terror, which Moses showed in the sight of all Israel." Yet this great prophet, raised up to be the leader and the legislator of God's people-this greatest of the prophets, with whom Jehovah conversed face to face, as a man talketh with his friend---bore to Jesus, as we are told, the humble relation of a servant to a son. And lest the superiority on the side of the Son should be deemed a mere superiority of the office to which he was appointed, we are told that the Son is "higher than the angels; being

[ocr errors]

the effulgence of God's glory, the express image of his person;" the God "whose throne is for ever and ever, the sceptre of whose kingdom is a sceptre of righteousness." And this high dignity of the Son is alleged as a motive for religious obedience to his commands, and for reliance on his promises. It is this, indeed, which gives such authority to his precepts, and such certainty to his whole doctrine, as render faith in him the first duty of religion. Had Christ been a mere prophet, to believe in Christ had been the same thing as to believe in John the Baptist. The messages, indeed, announced on the part of God by Christ and by John the Baptist might have been different, and the importance of the different messages unequal; but the principle of belief in either must have been the same.

Hence; it appears, that the intercourse which Christ as a man held with God was different in kind from that which the greatest of the prophets ever had enjoyed. And yet how it should differ, otherwise than in the degree of frequency and intimacy, it will not be very easy to explain, unless we adhere to the faith transmitted to us from the primitive ages, and believe that the Eternal Word, who was in the beginning with God, and was God, so joined to himself the holy thing which was formed in Mary's womb, that the two natures, from the commencement of the virgin's conception, made one person. Between God and any living being, having a distinct personality of his own separate from the Godhead, no other communion could obtain than what should consist in the action of the Divine Spirit upon the faculties of the separate person. This communion with God the prophets enjoyed. But Jesus, according to the primitive doctrine, was so united to the Ever-living Word, that the very existence of the man consisted in this union.* We shall not indeed find

* So Theodoret, in the fourth of his Seven Dialogues about the Trinity, published under the name of Athanasius. The persons in this Dialogue are an orthodox believer and an Apollinarian. The Apollinarian asks, Ουκ εστιν ουν Ιησους ανθρωπος; The believer replies,

« הקודםהמשך »