« הקודםהמשך »
Of the Time, when the Apocalypse appears to have been written and published . . . . .
CHAPTER III. The Testimony of Irena us and of other Fathers in the Church before him; of Ignatius; of Polycarp; of the JWriter of the Epistle describing Po
lycarp's Martyrdom; and of Papias
and Tertullian . . . . . . .
B 6 CHAP
The Evidence against the Apocalypse during its first Century; the rejection of it by Marcion, and by the Alogi; their Objections, so far as they relate to external Evidence, e.vamined
CHAPTER VI. The Testimonies of Hippolytus and of Origen ; the Objections of Caius, and of Dionysius of Alerandria, and of others preceding him. Animad
versions on the Conclusions of Michaelis, respecting this Evidence
The Testimonies of Gregory of Neocaesarea; of Dionysius of Alerandria; of his private Opinion; the Testimonies of other JWriters in the same Century; of Eusebius, and of the JWriters in his Time, and after him ; of the Reception of the Apocalypse at the Reformation -
The internal Evidence respecting the Apocalypse; from the Completion of its Prophecies; from its Correspondence in point of Doctrine and of Imagery with other Books of Divine Authority: Objections of Michaelis answered. True character of the Beauty and Sublimity in this Book ; Argument thence derived; Comparison of the Apocalypse with other JWritings of the same Age, Hermas and the Second Book of Esdras. Objec
tion arising from the Obscurity of the Book anstvered . . .
CHAPTER IX. PAGE
Of the internal Evidence respecting the Question, whether the Apocalypse was written by St. John. Dr. Lardner's Opinion; Opinions of others. Arguments of Dionysius of Alerandria, under five Heads ; Answers thereto, and to the Objections of Michaelis. Enquiry whether John the Evangelist, and John the Divine, were by the Ancients accounted the same Person. Evidence, from a Passage in the Book, that it was written by St. John. Recapitulation and Conclusion . . . . 107
B 7 A DIS