War and MoralityRichard A. Wasserstrom Wadsworth, 1970 - 136 עמודים |
מתוך הספר
תוצאות 1-3 מתוך 26
עמוד 65
... wrong . In fact , as I have mentioned , they would more likely than not find something admirable about it . The point , then , is this : The non - pacifist does not say that it is your duty to resist violence with force . The non ...
... wrong . In fact , as I have mentioned , they would more likely than not find something admirable about it . The point , then , is this : The non - pacifist does not say that it is your duty to resist violence with force . The non ...
עמוד 75
... wrong , and it is wrong to resist it . But the right to resist is precisely what having a right of safety of person is , if it is anything at all . Could the position be reformulated with a less " committal " concept of rights ? I do ...
... wrong , and it is wrong to resist it . But the right to resist is precisely what having a right of safety of person is , if it is anything at all . Could the position be reformulated with a less " committal " concept of rights ? I do ...
עמוד 98
... wrong " ; 25 and at still a third place : " [ E ] very Catholic theologian would condemn as intrinsically immoral the direct killing of innocent noncombatants . " 26 Now , leaving aside the question of whether Miss Anscombe has defined ...
... wrong " ; 25 and at still a third place : " [ E ] very Catholic theologian would condemn as intrinsically immoral the direct killing of innocent noncombatants . " 26 Now , leaving aside the question of whether Miss Anscombe has defined ...
תוכן
Introduction | 1 |
The Morality of Obliteration Bombing John C Ford S | 42 |
A Philosophical Analysis Jan Narveson | 54 |
זכויות יוצרים | |
4 קטעים אחרים שאינם מוצגים
מהדורות אחרות - הצג הכל
מונחים וביטויים נפוצים
action aggressive American Anscombe argue argument army Article attack authority behavior believe brutality Catholic Charter Christian cities civil population civilian population claim committed common plan condemned crimes against humanity criminal death of innocent defend destruction discuss distinction doctrine of self-defense double effect duty Elizabeth Anscombe enemy estimate Ethics evangelical counsels example fact fighting Germany guerrillas Hague Convention immoral individual innocent civilians innocent persons intention international law jus in bello justified killing Land Warfare large number laws of war least limits means meet violence merely military necessity millions modern murder nations Nazi non-combatants nuclear weapons obligations obliteration bombing one's pacifism pacifist peace philosophical position possible present problem punishment question rational persuasion reason relevant responsibility rules self-defense soldiers Spaight superior orders suppose target thing total war treaty Tribunal unjust violation violence with force waging war crimes war of aggression wars wrong