War and MoralityRichard A. Wasserstrom Wadsworth, 1970 - 136 עמודים |
מתוך הספר
תוצאות 1-3 מתוך 20
עמוד 64
... violence with force ? For example , there are pacifists who would only claim that they themselves ought not to . Others would say that only pacifists ought not to , or that all persons of a certain type , where the type is not specified ...
... violence with force ? For example , there are pacifists who would only claim that they themselves ought not to . Others would say that only pacifists ought not to , or that all persons of a certain type , where the type is not specified ...
עמוד 65
... violence with force . The non - pacifist is merely saying that there's nothing wrong with doing so , that one has every right to do so if he is so inclined . Whether we wish to add that a person would be foolish or silly to do so is ...
... violence with force . The non - pacifist is merely saying that there's nothing wrong with doing so , that one has every right to do so if he is so inclined . Whether we wish to add that a person would be foolish or silly to do so is ...
עמוד 67
... violence with force . In other words , he then believes that , other things being equal , one ought not to meet violence with force . He believes , to put it yet another way , that if one does meet violence with force , one must have a ...
... violence with force . In other words , he then believes that , other things being equal , one ought not to meet violence with force . He believes , to put it yet another way , that if one does meet violence with force , one must have a ...
תוכן
Introduction | 1 |
The Morality of Obliteration Bombing John C Ford S | 42 |
A Philosophical Analysis Jan Narveson | 54 |
זכויות יוצרים | |
4 קטעים אחרים שאינם מוצגים
מהדורות אחרות - הצג הכל
מונחים וביטויים נפוצים
action aggressive American Anscombe argue argument army Article attack authority behavior believe brutality Catholic Charter Christian cities civil population civilian population claim committed common plan condemned crimes against humanity criminal death of innocent defend destruction discuss distinction doctrine of self-defense double effect duty Elizabeth Anscombe enemy estimate Ethics evangelical counsels example fact fighting Germany guerrillas Hague Convention immoral individual innocent civilians innocent persons intention international law jus in bello justified killing Land Warfare large number laws of war least limits means meet violence merely military necessity millions modern murder nations Nazi non-combatants nuclear weapons obligations obliteration bombing one's pacifism pacifist peace philosophical position possible present problem punishment question rational persuasion reason relevant responsibility rules self-defense soldiers Spaight superior orders suppose target thing total war treaty Tribunal unjust violation violence with force waging war crimes war of aggression wars wrong