War and MoralityRichard A. Wasserstrom Wadsworth, 1970 - 136 עמודים |
מתוך הספר
תוצאות 1-3 מתוך 11
עמוד 87
... treaty or concord . Two sorts of assertions are often made concerning the role of the treaty in justifying resort to war . First , if a country has entered into a treaty not to go to war and if it violates that treaty , it is to be ...
... treaty or concord . Two sorts of assertions are often made concerning the role of the treaty in justifying resort to war . First , if a country has entered into a treaty not to go to war and if it violates that treaty , it is to be ...
עמוד 106
... Treaty of Mutual Assistance was sponsored by the League of Nations . In Article I the treaty declared " that aggressive war is an international crime , " and that the parties would " undertake that no one of them will be guilty of its ...
... Treaty of Mutual Assistance was sponsored by the League of Nations . In Article I the treaty declared " that aggressive war is an international crime , " and that the parties would " undertake that no one of them will be guilty of its ...
עמוד 107
... Treaties to which the Tribunal has just referred . It is also important to remember that Article 227 of the Treaty of Versailles provided for the constitution of a special tribunal , composed of representatives of five of the Allied and ...
... Treaties to which the Tribunal has just referred . It is also important to remember that Article 227 of the Treaty of Versailles provided for the constitution of a special tribunal , composed of representatives of five of the Allied and ...
תוכן
Introduction | 1 |
The Morality of Obliteration Bombing John C Ford S | 42 |
A Philosophical Analysis Jan Narveson | 54 |
זכויות יוצרים | |
4 קטעים אחרים שאינם מוצגים
מהדורות אחרות - הצג הכל
מונחים וביטויים נפוצים
action aggressive American Anscombe argue argument army Article attack authority behavior believe brutality Catholic Charter Christian cities civil population civilian population claim committed common plan condemned crimes against humanity criminal death of innocent defend destruction discuss distinction doctrine of self-defense double effect duty Elizabeth Anscombe enemy estimate Ethics evangelical counsels example fact fighting Germany guerrillas Hague Convention immoral individual innocent civilians innocent persons intention international law jus in bello justified killing Land Warfare large number laws of war least limits means meet violence merely military necessity millions modern murder nations Nazi non-combatants nuclear weapons obligations obliteration bombing one's pacifism pacifist peace philosophical position possible present problem punishment question rational persuasion reason relevant responsibility rules self-defense soldiers Spaight superior orders suppose target thing total war treaty Tribunal unjust violation violence with force waging war crimes war of aggression wars wrong