War and MoralityRichard A. Wasserstrom Wadsworth, 1970 - 136 עמודים |
מתוך הספר
תוצאות 1-3 מתוך 16
עמוד 82
... relevant criteria of assessment are prudential or strategic ones . Again , my answer would be that this also constitutes a perfectly defensible and relevant reason for making a moral judgment about the desirability of war as a social ...
... relevant criteria of assessment are prudential or strategic ones . Again , my answer would be that this also constitutes a perfectly defensible and relevant reason for making a moral judgment about the desirability of war as a social ...
עמוד 87
... relevant to the justice of punishing or blaming someone , so in the case of war , what has already happened is , on this view , relevant to the justice or rightness of the war that is subsequently waged . The two backward - looking ...
... relevant to the justice of punishing or blaming someone , so in the case of war , what has already happened is , on this view , relevant to the justice or rightness of the war that is subsequently waged . The two backward - looking ...
עמוד 95
... relevant sense from persons in the army . Thus , civilians may be manufac- turing munitions , devising new weapons , writing propaganda , or doing any number of other things that make them indistinguishable from many combatants vis - à ...
... relevant sense from persons in the army . Thus , civilians may be manufac- turing munitions , devising new weapons , writing propaganda , or doing any number of other things that make them indistinguishable from many combatants vis - à ...
תוכן
Introduction | 1 |
The Morality of Obliteration Bombing John C Ford S | 42 |
A Philosophical Analysis Jan Narveson | 54 |
זכויות יוצרים | |
4 קטעים אחרים שאינם מוצגים
מהדורות אחרות - הצג הכל
מונחים וביטויים נפוצים
action aggressive American Anscombe argue argument army Article attack authority behavior believe brutality Catholic Charter Christian cities civil population civilian population claim committed common plan condemned crimes against humanity criminal death of innocent defend destruction discuss distinction doctrine of self-defense double effect duty Elizabeth Anscombe enemy estimate Ethics evangelical counsels example fact fighting Germany guerrillas Hague Convention immoral individual innocent civilians innocent persons intention international law jus in bello justified killing Land Warfare large number laws of war least limits means meet violence merely military necessity millions modern murder nations Nazi non-combatants nuclear weapons obligations obliteration bombing one's pacifism pacifist peace philosophical position possible present problem punishment question rational persuasion reason relevant responsibility rules self-defense soldiers Spaight superior orders suppose target thing total war treaty Tribunal unjust violation violence with force waging war crimes war of aggression wars wrong