War and MoralityRichard A. Wasserstrom Wadsworth, 1970 - 136 עמודים |
מתוך הספר
תוצאות 1-3 מתוך 34
עמוד 16
... present paper takes the latter viewpoint . It is not aimed at settling difficulties of the individual soldier's conscience . Of course , there is an unavoidable logical connection between the morality of the whole plan and the morality ...
... present paper takes the latter viewpoint . It is not aimed at settling difficulties of the individual soldier's conscience . Of course , there is an unavoidable logical connection between the morality of the whole plan and the morality ...
עמוד 33
... present time there are numerous calls for revenge of the 26Mr . Spaight does not argue thus , however , in Bombing Vindicated . He claims that Germany never had a strategic bomber command and was seriously opposed to this kind of ...
... present time there are numerous calls for revenge of the 26Mr . Spaight does not argue thus , however , in Bombing Vindicated . He claims that Germany never had a strategic bomber command and was seriously opposed to this kind of ...
עמוד 39
... present and future . They will have just as much right to use it against us as they have to use guns against our soldiers . I do not believe any shortening of the present war , or any saving of the lives of our soldiers ( problematical ...
... present and future . They will have just as much right to use it against us as they have to use guns against our soldiers . I do not believe any shortening of the present war , or any saving of the lives of our soldiers ( problematical ...
תוכן
Introduction | 1 |
The Morality of Obliteration Bombing John C Ford S | 42 |
A Philosophical Analysis Jan Narveson | 54 |
זכויות יוצרים | |
4 קטעים אחרים שאינם מוצגים
מהדורות אחרות - הצג הכל
מונחים וביטויים נפוצים
action aggressive American Anscombe argue argument army Article attack authority behavior believe brutality Catholic Charter Christian cities civil population civilian population claim committed common plan condemned crimes against humanity criminal death of innocent defend destruction discuss distinction doctrine of self-defense double effect duty Elizabeth Anscombe enemy estimate Ethics evangelical counsels example fact fighting Germany guerrillas Hague Convention immoral individual innocent civilians innocent persons intention international law jus in bello justified killing Land Warfare large number laws of war least limits means meet violence merely military necessity millions modern murder nations Nazi non-combatants nuclear weapons obligations obliteration bombing one's pacifism pacifist peace philosophical position possible present problem punishment question rational persuasion reason relevant responsibility rules self-defense soldiers Spaight superior orders suppose target thing total war treaty Tribunal unjust violation violence with force waging war crimes war of aggression wars wrong