War and MoralityRichard A. Wasserstrom Wadsworth, 1970 - 136 עמודים |
מתוך הספר
תוצאות 1-3 מתוך 29
עמוד 28
... possible to employ this procedure without directly intending the damage to innocent civilians and their property ? Obviously , the destruction of property is directly intended . The leaders acknowl- edge it as an objective . And on this ...
... possible to employ this procedure without directly intending the damage to innocent civilians and their property ? Obviously , the destruction of property is directly intended . The leaders acknowl- edge it as an objective . And on this ...
עמוד 60
... possible conditions and need to be discussed . The view is common enough that the side fighting a just war has greater latitude in choosing means than does the side fighting an unjust war . After all , war is not a game ; crucial issues ...
... possible conditions and need to be discussed . The view is common enough that the side fighting a just war has greater latitude in choosing means than does the side fighting an unjust war . After all , war is not a game ; crucial issues ...
עמוד 96
... possible view is that which asserts simply that it is unimportant which circum- stances bring about the death of innocent persons . As long as we know that innocent persons will be killed as a result of war , we know all we need to know ...
... possible view is that which asserts simply that it is unimportant which circum- stances bring about the death of innocent persons . As long as we know that innocent persons will be killed as a result of war , we know all we need to know ...
תוכן
Introduction | 1 |
The Morality of Obliteration Bombing John C Ford S | 42 |
A Philosophical Analysis Jan Narveson | 54 |
זכויות יוצרים | |
4 קטעים אחרים שאינם מוצגים
מהדורות אחרות - הצג הכל
מונחים וביטויים נפוצים
action aggressive American Anscombe argue argument army Article attack authority behavior believe brutality Catholic Charter Christian cities civil population civilian population claim committed common plan condemned crimes against humanity criminal death of innocent defend destruction discuss distinction doctrine of self-defense double effect duty Elizabeth Anscombe enemy estimate Ethics evangelical counsels example fact fighting Germany guerrillas Hague Convention immoral individual innocent civilians innocent persons intention international law jus in bello justified killing Land Warfare large number laws of war least limits means meet violence merely military necessity millions modern murder nations Nazi non-combatants nuclear weapons obligations obliteration bombing one's pacifism pacifist peace philosophical position possible present problem punishment question rational persuasion reason relevant responsibility rules self-defense soldiers Spaight superior orders suppose target thing total war treaty Tribunal unjust violation violence with force waging war crimes war of aggression wars wrong