War and MoralityRichard A. Wasserstrom Wadsworth, 1970 - 136 עמודים |
מתוך הספר
תוצאות 1-3 מתוך 26
עמוד 64
... pacifism in this . We might go further and maintain , for example , that capital punishment , even for the crime of murder , is unjustified without doing so on pacifist grounds . Again , the pacifist should say just what sort of a ...
... pacifism in this . We might go further and maintain , for example , that capital punishment , even for the crime of murder , is unjustified without doing so on pacifist grounds . Again , the pacifist should say just what sort of a ...
עמוד 65
... pacifist does not say that it is your duty to resist violence with force . The non - pacifist is merely saying that there's nothing wrong with doing so , that one has ... pacifist " in the sense Pacifism : A Philosophical Analysis 65.
... pacifist does not say that it is your duty to resist violence with force . The non - pacifist is merely saying that there's nothing wrong with doing so , that one has ... pacifist " in the sense Pacifism : A Philosophical Analysis 65.
עמוד 69
... pacifist position as a genuine , full - blooded moral principle is to hold that nobody has a right to fight back when attacked , that fighting back ... pacifist is not merely addressing himself to Pacifism : A Philosophical Analysis 69.
... pacifist position as a genuine , full - blooded moral principle is to hold that nobody has a right to fight back when attacked , that fighting back ... pacifist is not merely addressing himself to Pacifism : A Philosophical Analysis 69.
תוכן
Introduction | 1 |
The Morality of Obliteration Bombing John C Ford S | 42 |
A Philosophical Analysis Jan Narveson | 54 |
זכויות יוצרים | |
4 קטעים אחרים שאינם מוצגים
מהדורות אחרות - הצג הכל
מונחים וביטויים נפוצים
action aggressive American Anscombe argue argument army Article attack authority behavior believe brutality Catholic Charter Christian cities civil population civilian population claim committed common plan condemned crimes against humanity criminal death of innocent defend destruction discuss distinction doctrine of self-defense double effect duty Elizabeth Anscombe enemy estimate Ethics evangelical counsels example fact fighting Germany guerrillas Hague Convention immoral individual innocent civilians innocent persons intention international law jus in bello justified killing Land Warfare large number laws of war least limits means meet violence merely military necessity millions modern murder nations Nazi non-combatants nuclear weapons obligations obliteration bombing one's pacifism pacifist peace philosophical position possible present problem punishment question rational persuasion reason relevant responsibility rules self-defense soldiers Spaight superior orders suppose target thing total war treaty Tribunal unjust violation violence with force waging war crimes war of aggression wars wrong