War and MoralityRichard A. Wasserstrom Wadsworth, 1970 - 136 עמודים |
מתוך הספר
תוצאות 1-3 מתוך 14
עמוד 125
... nuclear weapons , then , fall into this category of controversial precepts of the international law of war ? The Legality of Nuclear Weapons The question of the legality of nuclear weapons has received surprisingly scant attention from ...
... nuclear weapons , then , fall into this category of controversial precepts of the international law of war ? The Legality of Nuclear Weapons The question of the legality of nuclear weapons has received surprisingly scant attention from ...
עמוד 126
... weapons . The American Law of Land Warfare concludes , therefore , that nuclear weapons are legal or at least not illegal . " The use of explosive ' atomic weapons , ' whether by air , sea or land forces , cannot as such be regarded as ...
... weapons . The American Law of Land Warfare concludes , therefore , that nuclear weapons are legal or at least not illegal . " The use of explosive ' atomic weapons , ' whether by air , sea or land forces , cannot as such be regarded as ...
עמוד 128
... nuclear weapons violate the prohibition of the use of poison seems considerably stronger . Article 23 ( a ) of Hague Convention No. IV forbids the employment of poison or poisoned weapons and this rule today is regarded as so basic to ...
... nuclear weapons violate the prohibition of the use of poison seems considerably stronger . Article 23 ( a ) of Hague Convention No. IV forbids the employment of poison or poisoned weapons and this rule today is regarded as so basic to ...
תוכן
Introduction | 1 |
The Morality of Obliteration Bombing John C Ford S | 42 |
A Philosophical Analysis Jan Narveson | 54 |
זכויות יוצרים | |
4 קטעים אחרים שאינם מוצגים
מהדורות אחרות - הצג הכל
מונחים וביטויים נפוצים
action aggressive American Anscombe argue argument army Article attack authority behavior believe brutality Catholic Charter Christian cities civil population civilian population claim committed common plan condemned crimes against humanity criminal death of innocent defend destruction discuss distinction doctrine of self-defense double effect duty Elizabeth Anscombe enemy estimate Ethics evangelical counsels example fact fighting Germany guerrillas Hague Convention immoral individual innocent civilians innocent persons intention international law jus in bello justified killing Land Warfare large number laws of war least limits means meet violence merely military necessity millions modern murder nations Nazi non-combatants nuclear weapons obligations obliteration bombing one's pacifism pacifist peace philosophical position possible present problem punishment question rational persuasion reason relevant responsibility rules self-defense soldiers Spaight superior orders suppose target thing total war treaty Tribunal unjust violation violence with force waging war crimes war of aggression wars wrong