War and MoralityRichard A. Wasserstrom Wadsworth, 1970 - 136 עמודים |
מתוך הספר
תוצאות 1-3 מתוך 43
עמוד 8
... nations . Nations , General Lea says , are never stationary - they must necessarily expand or shrink , according to their vitality or decrepi- tude . Japan now is culminating ; and by the fatal law in question it is impossible that her ...
... nations . Nations , General Lea says , are never stationary - they must necessarily expand or shrink , according to their vitality or decrepi- tude . Japan now is culminating ; and by the fatal law in question it is impossible that her ...
עמוד 106
... Nations . In Article I the treaty declared " that aggressive war is an international crime , " and that the parties would " undertake that no one of them will be guilty of its commission . " The draft treaty was submitted to twenty ...
... Nations . In Article I the treaty declared " that aggressive war is an international crime , " and that the parties would " undertake that no one of them will be guilty of its commission . " The draft treaty was submitted to twenty ...
עמוד 121
... nations is unable to shield a citizen who wants to obey international law rather than the law or orders of his own government . Given this strong current of criticism - which is not limited to German scholars26 - the question whether ...
... nations is unable to shield a citizen who wants to obey international law rather than the law or orders of his own government . Given this strong current of criticism - which is not limited to German scholars26 - the question whether ...
תוכן
Introduction | 1 |
The Morality of Obliteration Bombing John C Ford S | 42 |
A Philosophical Analysis Jan Narveson | 54 |
זכויות יוצרים | |
4 קטעים אחרים שאינם מוצגים
מהדורות אחרות - הצג הכל
מונחים וביטויים נפוצים
action aggressive American Anscombe argue argument army Article attack authority behavior believe brutality Catholic Charter Christian cities civil population civilian population claim committed common plan condemned crimes against humanity criminal death of innocent defend destruction discuss distinction doctrine of self-defense double effect duty Elizabeth Anscombe enemy estimate Ethics evangelical counsels example fact fighting Germany guerrillas Hague Convention immoral individual innocent civilians innocent persons intention international law jus in bello justified killing Land Warfare large number laws of war least limits means meet violence merely military necessity millions modern murder nations Nazi non-combatants nuclear weapons obligations obliteration bombing one's pacifism pacifist peace philosophical position possible present problem punishment question rational persuasion reason relevant responsibility rules self-defense soldiers Spaight superior orders suppose target thing total war treaty Tribunal unjust violation violence with force waging war crimes war of aggression wars wrong