War and Morality

action aggression American argue argument army Article atomic attack authority behavior believe brutality Catholic Charter Christian civil population civilian population claim command commit condemned conscience crimes against humanity criminal defend destruction discuss distinction doctrine of self-defense double effect duty Elizabeth Anscombe enemy ethic example fact fighting Germany guerrillas Hague Convention immoral individual innocent civilians innocent persons intention international law jus in bello justified killing Land Warfare large number law of war least limits means meet violence merely military necessity modern murder nations Nazi non-combatants nuclear warfare nuclear weapons Nuremberg Nuremberg trials obligations obliteration bombing one's pacifism pacifist peace philosophical plea of superior position possible present prisoners problem punishment question rational persuasion reason relevant responsibility rules soldiers Spaight superior orders suppose thing total war treaty Tribunal violation violence with force waging war crimes war of aggression wars wrong