War and MoralityRichard A. Wasserstrom Wadsworth, 1970 - 136 עמודים |
מתוך הספר
תוצאות 1-3 מתוך 54
עמוד 27
... means made use of implicitly or explicitly to produce it ? To arrive at a sound moral estimate in these matters , it is often helpful to consider the physical proximity of the good and evil effects , or the inevitable and immediate ...
... means made use of implicitly or explicitly to produce it ? To arrive at a sound moral estimate in these matters , it is often helpful to consider the physical proximity of the good and evil effects , or the inevitable and immediate ...
עמוד 39
... means of warfare is made generally legitimate . Can we afford to justify from this time forward obliteration bombing as a legitimate instrument of war ? Once it is conceded that this is a lawful means of waging war , then it is equally ...
... means of warfare is made generally legitimate . Can we afford to justify from this time forward obliteration bombing as a legitimate instrument of war ? Once it is conceded that this is a lawful means of waging war , then it is equally ...
עמוד 45
... means to some further end . The right to attack with a view to killing is something that belongs only to rulers and those whom they command to do it . I have argued that it does belong to rulers precisely because of that threat of ...
... means to some further end . The right to attack with a view to killing is something that belongs only to rulers and those whom they command to do it . I have argued that it does belong to rulers precisely because of that threat of ...
תוכן
Introduction | 1 |
The Morality of Obliteration Bombing John C Ford S | 42 |
A Philosophical Analysis Jan Narveson | 54 |
זכויות יוצרים | |
4 קטעים אחרים שאינם מוצגים
מהדורות אחרות - הצג הכל
מונחים וביטויים נפוצים
action aggressive American Anscombe argue argument army Article attack authority behavior believe brutality Catholic Charter Christian cities civil population civilian population claim committed common plan condemned crimes against humanity criminal death of innocent defend destruction discuss distinction doctrine of self-defense double effect duty Elizabeth Anscombe enemy estimate Ethics evangelical counsels example fact fighting Germany guerrillas Hague Convention immoral individual innocent civilians innocent persons intention international law jus in bello justified killing Land Warfare large number laws of war least limits means meet violence merely military necessity millions modern murder nations Nazi non-combatants nuclear weapons obligations obliteration bombing one's pacifism pacifist peace philosophical position possible present problem punishment question rational persuasion reason relevant responsibility rules self-defense soldiers Spaight superior orders suppose target thing total war treaty Tribunal unjust violation violence with force waging war crimes war of aggression wars wrong