War and MoralityRichard A. Wasserstrom Wadsworth, 1970 - 136 עמודים |
מתוך הספר
תוצאות 1-3 מתוך 29
עמוד 18
... law . I say that this is an example of what is meant by the law of humanity , insofar as this law is distinct from natural or international law . Actually , when the laws of humanity are mentioned , some precept of natural law is often ...
... law . I say that this is an example of what is meant by the law of humanity , insofar as this law is distinct from natural or international law . Actually , when the laws of humanity are mentioned , some precept of natural law is often ...
עמוד 121
... international law imposes duties and obligations upon indi- viduals and that these therefore can be punished for war crimes committed under orders of a sovereign state or their military superiors . The law of warfare , like all ...
... international law imposes duties and obligations upon indi- viduals and that these therefore can be punished for war crimes committed under orders of a sovereign state or their military superiors . The law of warfare , like all ...
עמוד 122
... international law recognized by the Charter of the Nuremberg Tribunal , certainly does not establish the identity of these principles with international law.27 The Interna- tional Law Commission , cognizant of this fact , in its 1950 ...
... international law recognized by the Charter of the Nuremberg Tribunal , certainly does not establish the identity of these principles with international law.27 The Interna- tional Law Commission , cognizant of this fact , in its 1950 ...
תוכן
Introduction | 1 |
The Morality of Obliteration Bombing John C Ford S | 42 |
A Philosophical Analysis Jan Narveson | 54 |
זכויות יוצרים | |
4 קטעים אחרים שאינם מוצגים
מהדורות אחרות - הצג הכל
מונחים וביטויים נפוצים
action aggressive American Anscombe argue argument army Article attack authority behavior believe brutality Catholic Charter Christian cities civil population civilian population claim committed common plan condemned crimes against humanity criminal death of innocent defend destruction discuss distinction doctrine of self-defense double effect duty Elizabeth Anscombe enemy estimate Ethics evangelical counsels example fact fighting Germany guerrillas Hague Convention immoral individual innocent civilians innocent persons intention international law jus in bello justified killing Land Warfare large number laws of war least limits means meet violence merely military necessity millions modern murder nations Nazi non-combatants nuclear weapons obligations obliteration bombing one's pacifism pacifist peace philosophical position possible present problem punishment question rational persuasion reason relevant responsibility rules self-defense soldiers Spaight superior orders suppose target thing total war treaty Tribunal unjust violation violence with force waging war crimes war of aggression wars wrong