War and MoralityRichard A. Wasserstrom Wadsworth, 1970 - 136 עמודים |
מתוך הספר
תוצאות 1-3 מתוך 15
עמוד 46
... intention to be justifiable for the sake of self - defence . Yet the lawyers would hardly find the laying of poison tolerable as an act of self - defence , but only killing by a violent action in a moment of violence . Christian moral ...
... intention to be justifiable for the sake of self - defence . Yet the lawyers would hardly find the laying of poison tolerable as an act of self - defence , but only killing by a violent action in a moment of violence . Christian moral ...
עמוד 51
... intention was an interior act of the mind which could be produced at will . Now if intention is all important - as it is - in determining the goodness or badness of an action , then , on this theory of what intention is , a marvellous ...
... intention was an interior act of the mind which could be produced at will . Now if intention is all important - as it is - in determining the goodness or badness of an action , then , on this theory of what intention is , a marvellous ...
עמוד 55
... intentions and not of behavior . Even here , however , they are probably not right . In many wars it is possible to say that different degrees of brutality are intended by the different sides . Sometimes these different intentions are ...
... intentions and not of behavior . Even here , however , they are probably not right . In many wars it is possible to say that different degrees of brutality are intended by the different sides . Sometimes these different intentions are ...
תוכן
Introduction | 1 |
The Morality of Obliteration Bombing John C Ford S | 42 |
A Philosophical Analysis Jan Narveson | 54 |
זכויות יוצרים | |
4 קטעים אחרים שאינם מוצגים
מהדורות אחרות - הצג הכל
מונחים וביטויים נפוצים
action aggressive American Anscombe argue argument army Article attack authority behavior believe brutality Catholic Charter Christian cities civil population civilian population claim committed common plan condemned crimes against humanity criminal death of innocent defend destruction discuss distinction doctrine of self-defense double effect duty Elizabeth Anscombe enemy estimate Ethics evangelical counsels example fact fighting Germany guerrillas Hague Convention immoral individual innocent civilians innocent persons intention international law jus in bello justified killing Land Warfare large number laws of war least limits means meet violence merely military necessity millions modern murder nations Nazi non-combatants nuclear weapons obligations obliteration bombing one's pacifism pacifist peace philosophical position possible present problem punishment question rational persuasion reason relevant responsibility rules self-defense soldiers Spaight superior orders suppose target thing total war treaty Tribunal unjust violation violence with force waging war crimes war of aggression wars wrong