War and MoralityRichard A. Wasserstrom Wadsworth, 1970 - 136 עמודים |
מתוך הספר
תוצאות 1-3 מתוך 18
עמוד 96
... not propose an airtight definition of " innocence " in order to answer the question of whether , in any war , there will be a substantial number of innocent persons involved . For irrespective of which sense or senses of innocence are ...
... not propose an airtight definition of " innocence " in order to answer the question of whether , in any war , there will be a substantial number of innocent persons involved . For irrespective of which sense or senses of innocence are ...
עמוד 98
... innocent ] or make them a target for an attack which [ the attacker ] judges ... person is always intrinsically wrong " ; 25 and at still a third ... persons in time of war . There are two very different ambiguities in their ...
... innocent ] or make them a target for an attack which [ the attacker ] judges ... person is always intrinsically wrong " ; 25 and at still a third ... persons in time of war . There are two very different ambiguities in their ...
עמוד 99
... innocent person could never be justifiable - even , for example , if a failure to do so would bring about the death of many more innocent persons . This does not , of course , mean that the argument from the death of the innocent is ...
... innocent person could never be justifiable - even , for example , if a failure to do so would bring about the death of many more innocent persons . This does not , of course , mean that the argument from the death of the innocent is ...
תוכן
Introduction | 1 |
The Morality of Obliteration Bombing John C Ford S | 42 |
A Philosophical Analysis Jan Narveson | 54 |
זכויות יוצרים | |
4 קטעים אחרים שאינם מוצגים
מהדורות אחרות - הצג הכל
מונחים וביטויים נפוצים
action aggressive American Anscombe argue argument army Article attack authority behavior believe brutality Catholic Charter Christian cities civil population civilian population claim committed common plan condemned crimes against humanity criminal death of innocent defend destruction discuss distinction doctrine of self-defense double effect duty Elizabeth Anscombe enemy estimate Ethics evangelical counsels example fact fighting Germany guerrillas Hague Convention immoral individual innocent civilians innocent persons intention international law jus in bello justified killing Land Warfare large number laws of war least limits means meet violence merely military necessity millions modern murder nations Nazi non-combatants nuclear weapons obligations obliteration bombing one's pacifism pacifist peace philosophical position possible present problem punishment question rational persuasion reason relevant responsibility rules self-defense soldiers Spaight superior orders suppose target thing total war treaty Tribunal unjust violation violence with force waging war crimes war of aggression wars wrong