War and MoralityRichard A. Wasserstrom Wadsworth, 1970 - 136 עמודים |
מתוך הספר
תוצאות 1-3 מתוך 17
עמוד 55
... fighting in friendly territory are likely to intend less brutality - whatever the limits of their power - than armies fighting amidst a hostile population . Insofar as wars are territorially limited ( most wars are ) , one side probably ...
... fighting in friendly territory are likely to intend less brutality - whatever the limits of their power - than armies fighting amidst a hostile population . Insofar as wars are territorially limited ( most wars are ) , one side probably ...
עמוד 59
... fighting local guerrillas are different again : their very presence is generally enough to extend the limits of guerrilla success in such a way that the foreigners must assume that all natives are at least potential enemies . Foreigners ...
... fighting local guerrillas are different again : their very presence is generally enough to extend the limits of guerrilla success in such a way that the foreigners must assume that all natives are at least potential enemies . Foreigners ...
עמוד 60
... fighting a just war has greater latitude in choosing means than does the side fighting an unjust war . After all , war is not a game ; crucial issues are being decided ; sticking to the rules may well be less important than winning ...
... fighting a just war has greater latitude in choosing means than does the side fighting an unjust war . After all , war is not a game ; crucial issues are being decided ; sticking to the rules may well be less important than winning ...
תוכן
Introduction | 1 |
The Morality of Obliteration Bombing John C Ford S | 42 |
A Philosophical Analysis Jan Narveson | 54 |
זכויות יוצרים | |
4 קטעים אחרים שאינם מוצגים
מהדורות אחרות - הצג הכל
מונחים וביטויים נפוצים
action aggressive American Anscombe argue argument army Article attack authority behavior believe brutality Catholic Charter Christian cities civil population civilian population claim committed common plan condemned crimes against humanity criminal death of innocent defend destruction discuss distinction doctrine of self-defense double effect duty Elizabeth Anscombe enemy estimate Ethics evangelical counsels example fact fighting Germany guerrillas Hague Convention immoral individual innocent civilians innocent persons intention international law jus in bello justified killing Land Warfare large number laws of war least limits means meet violence merely military necessity millions modern murder nations Nazi non-combatants nuclear weapons obligations obliteration bombing one's pacifism pacifist peace philosophical position possible present problem punishment question rational persuasion reason relevant responsibility rules self-defense soldiers Spaight superior orders suppose target thing total war treaty Tribunal unjust violation violence with force waging war crimes war of aggression wars wrong