War and MoralityRichard A. Wasserstrom Wadsworth, 1970 - 136 עמודים |
מתוך הספר
תוצאות 1-3 מתוך 20
עמוד 15
... discuss here the question : Can any modern war be morally justified ? The overwhelming majority of Catholic theologians would answer , I am sure , that there can be a justifiable modern war . And the practically unanimous voice of ...
... discuss here the question : Can any modern war be morally justified ? The overwhelming majority of Catholic theologians would answer , I am sure , that there can be a justifiable modern war . And the practically unanimous voice of ...
עמוד 73
... discuss moral philosophy when he is about to murder you . Our question is : If force is the only way to prevent violence in a given case , is its use justified in that case ? This is a purely moral question which we can discuss without ...
... discuss moral philosophy when he is about to murder you . Our question is : If force is the only way to prevent violence in a given case , is its use justified in that case ? This is a purely moral question which we can discuss without ...
עמוד 91
... discussed above , that this is too restrictive a range for the legitimate application of the principle . More ... discuss the problem of war and the death of innocent persons in part IV . At present , however , I want to consider ...
... discussed above , that this is too restrictive a range for the legitimate application of the principle . More ... discuss the problem of war and the death of innocent persons in part IV . At present , however , I want to consider ...
תוכן
Introduction | 1 |
The Morality of Obliteration Bombing John C Ford S | 42 |
A Philosophical Analysis Jan Narveson | 54 |
זכויות יוצרים | |
4 קטעים אחרים שאינם מוצגים
מהדורות אחרות - הצג הכל
מונחים וביטויים נפוצים
action aggressive American Anscombe argue argument army Article attack authority behavior believe brutality Catholic Charter Christian cities civil population civilian population claim committed common plan condemned crimes against humanity criminal death of innocent defend destruction discuss distinction doctrine of self-defense double effect duty Elizabeth Anscombe enemy estimate Ethics evangelical counsels example fact fighting Germany guerrillas Hague Convention immoral individual innocent civilians innocent persons intention international law jus in bello justified killing Land Warfare large number laws of war least limits means meet violence merely military necessity millions modern murder nations Nazi non-combatants nuclear weapons obligations obliteration bombing one's pacifism pacifist peace philosophical position possible present problem punishment question rational persuasion reason relevant responsibility rules self-defense soldiers Spaight superior orders suppose target thing total war treaty Tribunal unjust violation violence with force waging war crimes war of aggression wars wrong