War and MoralityRichard A. Wasserstrom Wadsworth, 1970 - 136 עמודים |
מתוך הספר
תוצאות 1-3 מתוך 28
עמוד 71
... claim to be willing to go to any length , short of violence , to prevent violence . He might , for instance , stand ... claim that violence is morally wrong and unjust . We are , in the first place , claiming that a person has no ...
... claim to be willing to go to any length , short of violence , to prevent violence . He might , for instance , stand ... claim that violence is morally wrong and unjust . We are , in the first place , claiming that a person has no ...
עמוד 79
... claim that in matters of war morality has no place is ambiguous . To put it somewhat loosely , the claim may be descriptive , or it may be analytic , or it may be prescriptive . Thus , it would be descriptive if it were merely the factual ...
... claim that in matters of war morality has no place is ambiguous . To put it somewhat loosely , the claim may be descriptive , or it may be analytic , or it may be prescriptive . Thus , it would be descriptive if it were merely the factual ...
עמוד 88
... claim that a warring response to aggressive war is always justified is even more perplexing . One way to take this claim is to regard it as plain retributivism . A country is justified in fighting back because the aggressor hit first ...
... claim that a warring response to aggressive war is always justified is even more perplexing . One way to take this claim is to regard it as plain retributivism . A country is justified in fighting back because the aggressor hit first ...
תוכן
Introduction | 1 |
The Morality of Obliteration Bombing John C Ford S | 42 |
A Philosophical Analysis Jan Narveson | 54 |
זכויות יוצרים | |
4 קטעים אחרים שאינם מוצגים
מהדורות אחרות - הצג הכל
מונחים וביטויים נפוצים
action aggressive American Anscombe argue argument army Article attack authority behavior believe brutality Catholic Charter Christian cities civil population civilian population claim committed common plan condemned crimes against humanity criminal death of innocent defend destruction discuss distinction doctrine of self-defense double effect duty Elizabeth Anscombe enemy estimate Ethics evangelical counsels example fact fighting Germany guerrillas Hague Convention immoral individual innocent civilians innocent persons intention international law jus in bello justified killing Land Warfare large number laws of war least limits means meet violence merely military necessity millions modern murder nations Nazi non-combatants nuclear weapons obligations obliteration bombing one's pacifism pacifist peace philosophical position possible present problem punishment question rational persuasion reason relevant responsibility rules self-defense soldiers Spaight superior orders suppose target thing total war treaty Tribunal unjust violation violence with force waging war crimes war of aggression wars wrong