War and MoralityRichard A. Wasserstrom Wadsworth, 1970 - 136 עמודים |
מתוך הספר
תוצאות 1-3 מתוך 9
עמוד 55
... brutality cannot satisfy even the least scrupulous of moralists . But perhaps what Rustin means is that each side is as brutal as it can be , given its relative power . Brutality stops only when force is limited or when it encounters ...
... brutality cannot satisfy even the least scrupulous of moralists . But perhaps what Rustin means is that each side is as brutal as it can be , given its relative power . Brutality stops only when force is limited or when it encounters ...
עמוד 59
... brutality summed up in the orders issued by General Okamura , Japanese commander in the struggle against Communist guerrillas in North China during World War II : " Kill all ! Burn all ! Destroy all ! " At this point , the questions of ...
... brutality summed up in the orders issued by General Okamura , Japanese commander in the struggle against Communist guerrillas in North China during World War II : " Kill all ! Burn all ! Destroy all ! " At this point , the questions of ...
עמוד 61
... brutality are not the only basis of our political choices . We also pay attention to the purposes that brutality serves or supposedly serves ; we may even choose , not necessarily rightly , greater brutality for the sake of greater ...
... brutality are not the only basis of our political choices . We also pay attention to the purposes that brutality serves or supposedly serves ; we may even choose , not necessarily rightly , greater brutality for the sake of greater ...
תוכן
Introduction | 1 |
The Morality of Obliteration Bombing John C Ford S | 42 |
A Philosophical Analysis Jan Narveson | 54 |
זכויות יוצרים | |
4 קטעים אחרים שאינם מוצגים
מהדורות אחרות - הצג הכל
מונחים וביטויים נפוצים
action aggressive American Anscombe argue argument army Article attack authority behavior believe brutality Catholic Charter Christian cities civil population civilian population claim committed common plan condemned crimes against humanity criminal death of innocent defend destruction discuss distinction doctrine of self-defense double effect duty Elizabeth Anscombe enemy estimate Ethics evangelical counsels example fact fighting Germany guerrillas Hague Convention immoral individual innocent civilians innocent persons intention international law jus in bello justified killing Land Warfare large number laws of war least limits means meet violence merely military necessity millions modern murder nations Nazi non-combatants nuclear weapons obligations obliteration bombing one's pacifism pacifist peace philosophical position possible present problem punishment question rational persuasion reason relevant responsibility rules self-defense soldiers Spaight superior orders suppose target thing total war treaty Tribunal unjust violation violence with force waging war crimes war of aggression wars wrong