War and MoralityRichard A. Wasserstrom Wadsworth, 1970 - 136 עמודים |
מתוך הספר
תוצאות 1-3 מתוך 38
עמוד 29
... attack and other groups and sections that are immune from such attack . But incendiary and explosive bombs would hardly respect this distinction , for they destroy with equal impartiality either group . When an entire city is destroyed ...
... attack and other groups and sections that are immune from such attack . But incendiary and explosive bombs would hardly respect this distinction , for they destroy with equal impartiality either group . When an entire city is destroyed ...
עמוד 45
... attack them , or make them a target for an attack which he judges will help him towards victory . For murder is the deliberate killing of the innocent , whether for its own sake or as a means to some further end . The right to attack ...
... attack them , or make them a target for an attack which he judges will help him towards victory . For murder is the deliberate killing of the innocent , whether for its own sake or as a means to some further end . The right to attack ...
עמוד 89
... attack upon life and limb . Concomitantly , the doctrine can be interpreted to depend upon the proposition that it is a natural , almost unavoidable - and hence excusable - reaction to defend oneself when attacked . In either case what ...
... attack upon life and limb . Concomitantly , the doctrine can be interpreted to depend upon the proposition that it is a natural , almost unavoidable - and hence excusable - reaction to defend oneself when attacked . In either case what ...
תוכן
Introduction | 1 |
The Morality of Obliteration Bombing John C Ford S | 42 |
A Philosophical Analysis Jan Narveson | 54 |
זכויות יוצרים | |
4 קטעים אחרים שאינם מוצגים
מהדורות אחרות - הצג הכל
מונחים וביטויים נפוצים
action aggressive American Anscombe argue argument army Article attack authority behavior believe brutality Catholic Charter Christian cities civil population civilian population claim committed common plan condemned crimes against humanity criminal death of innocent defend destruction discuss distinction doctrine of self-defense double effect duty Elizabeth Anscombe enemy estimate Ethics evangelical counsels example fact fighting Germany guerrillas Hague Convention immoral individual innocent civilians innocent persons intention international law jus in bello justified killing Land Warfare large number laws of war least limits means meet violence merely military necessity millions modern murder nations Nazi non-combatants nuclear weapons obligations obliteration bombing one's pacifism pacifist peace philosophical position possible present problem punishment question rational persuasion reason relevant responsibility rules self-defense soldiers Spaight superior orders suppose target thing total war treaty Tribunal unjust violation violence with force waging war crimes war of aggression wars wrong