War and MoralityRichard A. Wasserstrom Wadsworth, 1970 - 136 עמודים |
מתוך הספר
תוצאות 1-3 מתוך 16
עמוד 102
Richard A. Wasserstrom. The International Tribunal at Nuremberg Judgment and Opinion The Charter Provisions 102 The individual defendants are indicated under Article 6 of the Charter , which is as follows : Article 6. The Tribunal ...
Richard A. Wasserstrom. The International Tribunal at Nuremberg Judgment and Opinion The Charter Provisions 102 The individual defendants are indicated under Article 6 of the Charter , which is as follows : Article 6. The Tribunal ...
עמוד 103
... Tribunal as the law to be applied to the case . The Tribunal will later discuss them in more detail ; but , before doing so , it is necessary to review the facts . For the purpose of showing the background of the aggressive war and war ...
... Tribunal as the law to be applied to the case . The Tribunal will later discuss them in more detail ; but , before doing so , it is necessary to review the facts . For the purpose of showing the background of the aggressive war and war ...
עמוד 107
... Tribunal has just referred . It is also important to remember that Article 227 of the Treaty of Versailles provided for the constitution of a special tribunal , composed of representatives of five of the Allied and Associated Powers ...
... Tribunal has just referred . It is also important to remember that Article 227 of the Treaty of Versailles provided for the constitution of a special tribunal , composed of representatives of five of the Allied and Associated Powers ...
תוכן
Introduction | 1 |
The Morality of Obliteration Bombing John C Ford S | 42 |
A Philosophical Analysis Jan Narveson | 54 |
זכויות יוצרים | |
4 קטעים אחרים שאינם מוצגים
מהדורות אחרות - הצג הכל
מונחים וביטויים נפוצים
action aggressive American Anscombe argue argument army Article attack authority behavior believe brutality Catholic Charter Christian cities civil population civilian population claim committed common plan condemned crimes against humanity criminal death of innocent defend destruction discuss distinction doctrine of self-defense double effect duty Elizabeth Anscombe enemy estimate Ethics evangelical counsels example fact fighting Germany guerrillas Hague Convention immoral individual innocent civilians innocent persons intention international law jus in bello justified killing Land Warfare large number laws of war least limits means meet violence merely military necessity millions modern murder nations Nazi non-combatants nuclear weapons obligations obliteration bombing one's pacifism pacifist peace philosophical position possible present problem punishment question rational persuasion reason relevant responsibility rules self-defense soldiers Spaight superior orders suppose target thing total war treaty Tribunal unjust violation violence with force waging war crimes war of aggression wars wrong