War and MoralityRichard A. Wasserstrom Wadsworth, 1970 - 136 עמודים |
מתוך הספר
תוצאות 1-3 מתוך 10
עמוד 26
... Spaight , Bombing Vindicated , p . 115 , says : " All the civilians enrolled in the service of passive defense - the fire fighters , the fire - watchers , the rescue parties , the demolition squads - cannot be classed otherwise than as ...
... Spaight , Bombing Vindicated , p . 115 , says : " All the civilians enrolled in the service of passive defense - the fire fighters , the fire - watchers , the rescue parties , the demolition squads - cannot be classed otherwise than as ...
עמוד 30
... Spaight , one of the most enthusi- astic and articulate defenders of the bombing ) , 5000 acres of the built - up part of the city were wiped out . That means a territory eight miles square . And the American Army Air Forces ' official ...
... Spaight , one of the most enthusi- astic and articulate defenders of the bombing ) , 5000 acres of the built - up part of the city were wiped out . That means a territory eight miles square . And the American Army Air Forces ' official ...
עמוד 33
... Spaight does not argue thus , however , in Bombing Vindicated . He claims that Germany never had a strategic bomber command and was seriously opposed to this kind of bombing in the present war , for reasons of self - interest ( pp . 30 ...
... Spaight does not argue thus , however , in Bombing Vindicated . He claims that Germany never had a strategic bomber command and was seriously opposed to this kind of bombing in the present war , for reasons of self - interest ( pp . 30 ...
תוכן
Introduction | 1 |
The Morality of Obliteration Bombing John C Ford S | 42 |
A Philosophical Analysis Jan Narveson | 54 |
זכויות יוצרים | |
4 קטעים אחרים שאינם מוצגים
מהדורות אחרות - הצג הכל
מונחים וביטויים נפוצים
action aggressive American Anscombe argue argument army Article attack authority behavior believe brutality Catholic Charter Christian cities civil population civilian population claim committed common plan condemned crimes against humanity criminal death of innocent defend destruction discuss distinction doctrine of self-defense double effect duty Elizabeth Anscombe enemy estimate Ethics evangelical counsels example fact fighting Germany guerrillas Hague Convention immoral individual innocent civilians innocent persons intention international law jus in bello justified killing Land Warfare large number laws of war least limits means meet violence merely military necessity millions modern murder nations Nazi non-combatants nuclear weapons obligations obliteration bombing one's pacifism pacifist peace philosophical position possible present problem punishment question rational persuasion reason relevant responsibility rules self-defense soldiers Spaight superior orders suppose target thing total war treaty Tribunal unjust violation violence with force waging war crimes war of aggression wars wrong