 ... exclusively, they belong to the corporate body in its public, political, or municipal character. But if the grant was for purposes of private advantage and emolument, though the public may derive a common benefit therefrom, the corporation quoad hoc...  The Southwestern Reporter - עמוד 3741891תצוגה מלאה - מידע על ספר זה
 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1909 - 790 דפים
...common benefit therefrom, the corporation quoad hoc is to be regarded as a private company. It stands on the same footing as would any individual or body of persons upon whom the like special franchises had been conferred." Although it was said in Davidson v. Hine, that " a... | |
 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1874 - 664 דפים
...common benefit therefrom, the corporation quoad hoc is to be regarded as a private company. It stands on the same footing as would any individual or body of persons upon whom the like special franchises had been conferred." In San Francisco Gas Company v. San Francisco, 9 Cal.,... | |
 | Murray Hoffman - 1853 - 456 דפים
...common benefit therefrom, the Corporation, so far, is to be regarded as a private company. It stands on the same footing as would any individual or body of persons, upon whom the like special franchises had been conferred. It is upon the like distinction that municipal corporations,... | |
 | Oliver Lorenzo Barbour - 1858 - 714 דפים
...defendants quoad hoc were to be regarded as a private company." He says : i: It [the corporation] stands on the same footing as would any individual or body of persons upon whom the like special franchise had been conferred," and cites a large number of authorities on the point.... | |
 | Illinois. Supreme Court - 1907 - 750 דפים
...its capacity of a private corporation and not in the exercise of its police powers. It stands upon the same footing as would any individual or body of persons upon whom like special franchises had been conferred. ll'\1gner v. Rock Island, 146 111. 154. Where an injury... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1867 - 732 דפים
...respect to the powers conferred by these laws, is to be regarded as a private corporation, standing on the same footing as would any individual or body of persons upon whom like privileges had been conferred. Or, in the language of the court in Bailey v. The JUayor, £e.,... | |
 | Thomas McIntyre Cooley - 1868 - 776 דפים
...common benefit therefrom, the corporation quo ad hoc is to be regarded as a private company. It stands on the same footing as would any individual or body of persons upon whom the like special franchises had been conferred.1 " Suppose the legislature, instead of the franchise... | |
 | North Carolina. Supreme Court - 1905 - 922 דפים
...common benefit therefrom, the corporation quoad hac is to be regarded as a private company. It stands on the same footing as would any individual or body of persons upon whom the like special franchises had been conferred." In that case, the plaintiff sued for the negligent... | |
 | Thomas McIntyre Cooley - 1874 - 914 דפים
...common benefit therefrom, the corporation quo ad hoc is to be regarded as a private company. It stands on the same footing as would any individual or body of persons upon whom the like special franchises had been conferred.1 " Suppose the legislature, instead of the franchise... | |
 | William Wait - 1878 - 1004 דפים
...common benefit therefrom, the corporation, qua ad hoc, is to be regarded as a private company. It stands on the same footing, as would any individual, or body of persons, upon whom like special franchises had been conferred." Bailey v. Mayor, etc., of New York, 3 Hill, 531. See,... | |
| |
