Restorative Justice & Responsive RegulationOxford University Press, 15 בנוב׳ 2001 - 336 עמודים Braithwaite's argument against punitive justice systems and for restorative justice systems establishes that there are good theoretical and empirical grounds for anticipating that well designed restorative justice processes will restore victims, offenders, and communities better than existing criminal justice practices. Counterintuitively, he also shows that a restorative justice system may deter, incapacitate, and rehabilitate more effectively than a punitive system. This is particularly true when the restorative justice system is embedded in a responsive regulatory framework that opts for deterrence only after restoration repeatedly fails, and incapacitation only after escalated deterrence fails. Braithwaite's empirical research demonstrates that active deterrence under the dynamic regulatory pyramid that is a hallmark of the restorative justice system he supports, is far more effective than the passive deterrence that is notable in the stricter "sentencing grid" of current criminal justice systems. |
תוכן
3 | |
Responsive Regulation | 29 |
Does Restorative Justice Work? | 45 |
Theories That Might Explain Why Restorative Justice Works | 73 |
Worries about Restorative Justice | 137 |
World Peacemaking | 169 |
Sustainable Development | 211 |
Transforming the Legal System | 239 |
References | 269 |
297 | |
מהדורות אחרות - הצג הכל
Restorative Justice & Responsive Regulation <span dir=ltr>John Braithwaite</span> תצוגה מקדימה מוגבלת - 2001 |
Restorative Justice & Responsive Regulation <span dir=ltr>John Braithwaite</span> תצוגה מקדימה מוגבלת - 2002 |
Restorative Justice & Responsive Regulation <span dir=ltr>John Braithwaite</span> תצוגה מקדימה מוגבלת - 2002 |
מונחים וביטויים נפוצים
abuse approach Australian become better Braithwaite cause chapter circle citizens civil commitment compared compliance concern conference corporate court crime criminal criminal justice culture democratic deterrence diplomacy discussed domination economic edited effect empirical enforcement evidence example experience fail give healing human idea important increase individual injustice institutions interests involved justice processes kind lawyers less major matter means mediation meeting move offenders organizations participants peace peacemaking percent person police political practices Press prevention problem programs punishment pyramid reason reduce reform regulation regulatory reintegrative respect responsive restorative justice result Review risk rule secure seen serious shame shows social society strategy theory things traditional United University values victims violence young