Thirdly, Whether they have not hitherto supposed themselves bound to believe, that Christ died for their sins and rose for their justification? Do they not think it lawful to pray that God would bestow upon them grace and glory for Christ's sake? and to believe that Jesus Christ was such a Mediator of the new covenant, as procured for the persons covenanted withal, all the good things comprehended in the promise of that covenant?

I will not farther press upon this prevarication against Christian religion, only I would desire all the lovers of Jesus Christ seriously to consider, whether these men do truly aim at his honour, and advancing the dignity of his merit, and not rather at the crying up of their own endeavours, seeing the sole cause of their denying these glorious effects of the blood of Christ, is to appropriate the praise of them unto themselves, as we shall see in the next chapter.

These charges are never to be waved by the vanity of their sophistical distinctions, as of that of impetration and application, which though it may be received in an orthodox meaning, yet not in that sense or rather nonsense whereunto they abuse it; viz. as though Christ had obtained that for some which shall never be imparted unto them, that all the blessings procured by his death are proper to none, but pendent in the air for them that can or will catch them: whereupon when we object, that by this means all the efficacy of the merit of Christ is in our own power, they readily grant it, and say it cannot otherwise be. Let them that can receive these monsters in Christianity, for my part in these following contradictory assertions, I will choose rather to adhere to the authority of the word of God, than of Arminius and his sectaries.

Sic efficacia meriti Christi tota penes nos stabit, qui vocationem alioqui inecacem, efficacem reddimus: sane, fieri aliter non potest. Rem. Apol. p. 93.

S. S.

'Who his ownself bare our sins in his own body on the tree, that we being dead to sin, should live unto righteousness, by whose stripes: we are healed;' 1 Pet. ii. 24.

Lib. Arbit.

Why then the efficacy of the death of Christ depends wholly on us : true; it cannot otherwise be;' Rem. Apol.,

CHAP. X.

Of the cause of faith, grace, and righteousness,

THE second part of this controversy is in particular concerning grace, faith, and holiness, sincere obedience to the precepts of the new covenant, all whose praise we appropriate to the Most High by reason of a double interest. First, Of the merit of Christ which doth procure them for us. Secondly, Of the Holy Spirit which works them in us. The death of Christ is their meritorious cause, the Spirit of God and his effectual grace their efficient, working instrumentally with power by the word and ordinances. Now because this would deprive the idol of his chiefest glory, and expose him to open shame, like the bird 'furtivis nudata coloribus,' the Arminians advance themselves in his quarrel, and in behalf of their darling, quite exclude both merit of Christ and Spirit of God from any title to their production.

First, For the merit of Christ: whereas we affirm that God blesseth us with all spiritual blessings in him or for his sake; Eph. i. 3. amongst which, doubtless, faith possesseth not the lowest room; that he is made unto us righteousness, and sanctification, and redemption; he was made sin for us, that we might be made the righteousness of God in him; that he is the Lord our righteousness, and glories to be called by that name; and whatever he is unto us, it is chiefly by the way of merit; that to us it is given uπEρ Xploтou, for Christ's sake to believe on him; Phil. i. 29. where uπEρ XPLOTO is plainly referred to didorai, 'is given;' as if the apostle should have said, Christ is the meritorious cause of the bestowing of those good gifts, faith and constancy unto martyrdom upon you; when I say we profess all these to be the pro

per and immediate products of the passion and blood of Christ, these turbulent Davusses come in with a prohibition, and quite expel it from having any interest therein.

'There is nothing more vain," nothing more foolish,' say they in their apology, than to attribute our regeneration and faith unto the death of Christ; for if Christ may be said to have merited for us faith and regeneration, then faith cannot be a condition, whose performance God should require at the hands of sinners under the pain of eternal dam→ nation.' And again, 'If faith be the effect of the merit of Christ, it cannot be our duty.' No? Suppose then that the church should pray that it would please God, for Christ's sake, to call home those sheep that belong to his fold, not as yet collected; that he would grant faith and repentance for the merit of his Son to them that are as yet afar off, were this an altogether vain and foolish prayer? Let others think as they please, it is such a vanity as I desire not to be weaned from, nor any one else I believe, that loves the Lord Jesus in sincerity. Oh that Christians should patiently endure such a diminution of their Saviour's honour, as with one dash of an Arminian pen to have the chief effects of his death and passion quite obliterated: if this be a motive to the love and honour of the Son of God, if this be a way to set forth the preciousness of his blood by denying the efficacy thereof, in enabling us by faith to get an interest in the new covenant; most Christians in the world are under a necessity of being new catechised by these seraphical doctors.

Until when, they must give us leave to believe with the apostle, that God blesseth us with all spiritual blessings in Christ;' Eph. i. 3. and we will take leave to account faith a spiritual blessing; and, therefore, bestowed on us for Christ's sake; again, since our regeneration is nothing but a purging of our consciences from dead works that we may serve the living God, which being done by the blood of Christ, as the apostle witnesseth, Heb. ix. 14. we will ascribe our new birth, or forming anew, to the virtue of that grace which is pur

a Nihil ineptius, nihil vanius, quam regenerationem et fidem, merito Christi tribuere, si enim Christus dicatur nobis meritus fidem et regenerationem, tum fides conditio esse non poterat : quam a peccatoribus, Deus sub comminatione mortis æternæ exigerit. Rem. Apol. cap. 8. pag. 95. Si fides sit effectum meriti Christi non potest esse actus officii nostri : idem.

chased by his blood, that precious blood it is which redeemeth us from our vain conversation;' 1 Pet. i. 18, 19. by whose efficacy we are vindicated from the state of sin and corrupted nature wherein we are born.

The Arminians have but one argument that ever I could meet with, whereby they strive to rob Christ of this glory of meriting and procuring for us faith and repentance; and that is, because they are such acts of ours, as in duty and obedience to the precepts of the gospel we are bound to perform; and this they every where press at large, usque et usque, in plain terms, they will not suffer their idol to be accounted defective in any thing that is necessary to bring us unto heaven. Now concerning this argument, that nothing which God requireth of us can be procured for us by Christ, I would have two things noted. First, That the strength of it consists in this, that no gift of God bestowed upon us can be a thing well pleasing to him as being in us; for all his precepts and commands signify only what is well pleasing unto him that we should be or do; and it is not the meriting of any thing by Christ, but God's bestowing of it as the effect thereof, which hinders it from being a thing requirable of us as a part of our duty, which I shall consider hereafter; only now observe, that there being nothing in us by the way of habit or act, from the beginning of our faith to the consummation thereof, from our new birth until we become perfect men in Christ by the finishing of our course, that is not required of us in the gospel, all and every grace, whereof we are in this life partakers, are by this means denied to be the gifts of God. Secondly, Consider the extent of this argument itself: nothing whose performance is our duty can be merited for us by Christ; when the apostle beseecheth us to be reconciled unto God, I would know whether it be not a part of our duty to yield obedience to the apostle's exhortation? If not, his exhortation is frivolous and vain; if so, then to be reconciled unto God is a part of our duty; and yet the Arminians sometimes seem to confess, that Christ hath obtained for us a reconciliation with God. The like may be said in divers other particulars, so that this argument either proveth that we enjoy no fruit of the death of Christ in this life, or (which is most true), it proveth

h Rem. Apol. ubi sup. Corvin. ad Moli. cap. 28. sect. 9.