Must We Mean What We Say?: A Book of EssaysCambridge University Press, 6 באוק׳ 2015 In this classic collection of wide-ranging and interdisciplinary essays, Stanley Cavell explores a remarkably broad range of philosophical issues from politics and ethics to the arts and philosophy. The essays explore issues as diverse as the opposing approaches of 'analytic' and 'Continental' philosophy, modernism, Wittgenstein, abstract expressionism and Schoenberg, Shakespeare on human needs, the difficulties of authorship, Kierkegaard and post-Enlightenment religion. Presented in a fresh twenty-first century series livery, and including a specially commissioned preface, written by Stephen Mulhall, illuminating its continuing importance and relevance to philosophical enquiry, this influential work is now available for a new generation of readers. |
מתוך הספר
תוצאות 1-5 מתוך 50
עמוד
... traditional epistemology, and in particular of skepticism. My debt to Clarke is systematic, because it was through him, together with a study of Wittgenstein's Philosophical Investigations (on which we gave a joint seminar in 1959–60) ...
... traditional epistemology, and in particular of skepticism. My debt to Clarke is systematic, because it was through him, together with a study of Wittgenstein's Philosophical Investigations (on which we gave a joint seminar in 1959–60) ...
עמוד
... traditional philosophy; this idea grew for me into an ideal of criticism, and it is central to all my work in philosophy since then. Its most explicit statement, in the work which appears here, is given in the opening pages of “Knowing ...
... traditional philosophy; this idea grew for me into an ideal of criticism, and it is central to all my work in philosophy since then. Its most explicit statement, in the work which appears here, is given in the opening pages of “Knowing ...
עמוד
... traditional, in philosophy and out. My claim is not that all contemporary philosophy which is good is modern; but the various discussions about the modern I am led to in the course of these essays are the best I can offer in explanation ...
... traditional, in philosophy and out. My claim is not that all contemporary philosophy which is good is modern; but the various discussions about the modern I am led to in the course of these essays are the best I can offer in explanation ...
עמוד
... tradition which is essentially not oral; this suggests that such contributions must be exceptional. It indicates further that writing plays differing roles in different enterprises, even that “writing” means something different, or has ...
... tradition which is essentially not oral; this suggests that such contributions must be exceptional. It indicates further that writing plays differing roles in different enterprises, even that “writing” means something different, or has ...
עמוד
... tradition) to the concern and implication of their work for correct instruction. (There is no revolutionary social vision which does not include a new vision of education; and contrariwise.) This, together with the fact that their ...
... tradition) to the concern and implication of their work for correct instruction. (There is no revolutionary social vision which does not include a new vision of education; and contrariwise.) This, together with the fact that their ...
תוכן
The availability of Wittgensteins later philosophy | |
Aesthetic problems of modern philosophy | |
Austin at criticism | |
A reading of Becketts | |
Kierkegaards On Authority and Revelation | |
Music discomposed | |
A matter of meaning | |
Knowing and acknowledging | |
A reading of King Lear | |
מהדורות אחרות - הצג הכל
Must We Mean What We Say?: A Book of Essays <span dir=ltr>Stanley Cavell</span> תצוגה מקדימה מוגבלת - 2002 |
Must We Mean What We Say?: A Book of Essays <span dir=ltr>Stanley Cavell</span> תצוגה מקדימה מוגבלת - 2015 |
Must We Mean What We Say?: A Book of Essays <span dir=ltr>Stanley Cavell</span> תצוגה מקדימה מוגבלת - 2002 |
מונחים וביטויים נפוצים
accept acknowledgment action aesthetic analytical philosophy answer Antony Flew appeal artist audience Austin's Beckett become believe book on Adler characters claim Clov concept context Cordelia course criticism deny Edgar Endgame epistemology essay example experience explanation expression fact father feel Gloucester Gloucester’s God’s Hamm Hamm’s happening human idea imagine intention Investigations irrelevant J. O. Urmson justified Kant Kierkegaard King Lear knowledge language game Lear’s logical matter mean meant merely mind modern moral motive nature Nietzsche object obvious one’s ordinary language ordinary language philosophy ourselves pain paraphrase particular perhaps person philosophical Philosophical Investigations play poem Pop Art present problem question reason relation relevant response revealed rules scene seems sense Shakespeare simply skeptic someone speak specific statements suggest suppose tell theater thing thought tradition tragedy true understand wish Wittgenstein words wrong